Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 603

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Association between Hearing Loss and Social Isolation in Older Adults

Mick, Paul, Kawachi, Ichiro, Lin, Frank R.·2014·Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery

Abstract

Objective: To determine if age‐related hearing loss is associated with social isolation and whether factors such as age, gender, income, race, or hearing aid use moderated the association. Study Design: Cross‐sectional. Setting: Randomly sampled United States communities. Subjects and Methods: Cross‐sectional data on adults 60 to 84 years old from the 1999 to 2006 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed. The dependent variable was social isolation, which was defined using the social isolation score (SIS), a 4‐point composite index consisting of items pertaining to strength of social network and support. SIS scores ≥2 were considered indicative of social isolation. The independent (predictor) variable was the pure tone average of speech frequency (0.5‐4 kHz) hearing thresholds in the better‐hearing ear. Covariates included potential medical, demographic, and otologic confounders. We used multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the association between hearing loss and the odds of having social isolation. An exploratory analysis was performed to assess the strength of associations between hearing loss and individual items of the SIS scale. Results: Greater hearing loss was associated with increased odds of social isolation in women aged 60 to 69 years (odds ratio [OR], 3.49 per 25‐dB of hearing loss; 95% confidence interval, 1.91, 6.39; P <. 001). Effect modification by gender was significant in this age group (P =. 003). Hearing loss was not significantly associated with social isolation in other age and gender groups. Conclusions: Greater hearing loss is associated with increased odds of being social isolated in a nationally representative sample of women aged 60 to 69 years.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0194599813518021

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 603

Metadata

Authors
Mick, P., Kawachi, I., & Lin, F. R.
Venue
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-02
Volume
150
Issue
3
Pages
378-384
ISSN
  • 0161-6439 (ISSN-L)
  • 0194-5998
  • 1097-6817
OpenAlex
W1998491537
Cited by
603
References
4
FWCI
13.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Association between Hearing Loss and Social Isolation in Older Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0194599813518021
The paper
Mick, P., Kawachi, I., & Lin, F. R. (2014). The Association between Hearing Loss and Social Isolation in Older Adults. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599813518021

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.