Classical and Philosophical Hermeneutics
Abstract
Hermeneutics is a mantic art involved in the translation of the unintelligible into the intelligible. However, within modern contexts the term possesses a more methodological sense - ‘a universal doctrine for the interpretation of signs’. This conception of hermeneutics was given impetus during the Renaissance with the quest for theological objectivity, but it was with Schleiermacher and other philosophers of the Romantic movement that hermeneutics was viewed as a universal ‘dialogical’ condition. The Romantic conception of hermeneutics was psychologized by Dilthey and re-founded upon the principle of consciousness. With Heidegger became conceived as an ontological phenomenon identical to Existenz itself. For Gadamer, hermeneutics criticizes the ‘pale abstractions’ of Enlightenment conceptions of philosophy for neglecting the work of concepts in philosophy; concepts that have their origins in the self-critical communicative movement of human interpretation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The term philosophical hermeneutics is mostly associated with the work of Martin Heidegger, Hans-Georg Gadamer, and Paul Ricoeur.
“The term is mostly associated with the work of Martin Heidegger, Hans-Georg Gadamer, and Paul Ricoeur.”
From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Gadamer 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games
Arjoranta, J. (2018) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/uep74 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Hermeneutic Inquiry for Digital Games Research
Tanenbaum, T. J. (2015) · The Computer Games Journal · doi:10.1007/s40869-015-0005-9 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Ludology, Narratology and Philosophical Hermeneutics
Arjoranta, J., & Karhulahti, V.-M. (2014) · DiGRA Digital Library · doi:10.26503/dl.v2014i2.703 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gadamer, H.-G.
- Corresponding author
- Gadamer, Hans-Georg
- Venue
- Theory, Culture & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-56
- ISSN
- 0263-2764 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3616
- OpenAlex
- W1978338501
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 21.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Theory Culture & Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Theory and Philosophy
- Keywords
- hermeneutics, sign interpretation, Friedrich Schleiermacher, Romanticism, Wilhelm Dilthey, Martin Heidegger, Hans-Georg Gadamer, consciousness, critique of Enlightenment, philosophy of concepts, dialogical interpretation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review