The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Good to have but not to use: Differential impact of perceived and received support on well-being
Abstract
Research documents a positive association between perceived support availability and well-being in later life. Other work shows that actually receiving support can have negative effects. Instrumental support receipt may be negative for persons with chronic impairment as it may emphasize their inability to accomplish daily tasks. This study contrasted the impact of perceived and received affective and instrumental support on adaptation to chronic vision impairment in 570 elders. After accounting for the significant, positive impact of perceived support, receiving instrumental support had a negative effect, while receiving affective support had a positive effect on well-being. Findings underscore the importance of distinguishing the association of multiple support components and outcomes to increase understanding of how support affects adaptation in later life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 · Cited by 18,093
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990) · Successful Aging · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511665684.003 · Cited by 3,739
Social support: An interactional view.
Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., & Pierce, G. R. (1990) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 2,657
Perceived support, received support, and adjustment to stressful life events
Wethington, E., & Kessler, R. C. (1986) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136504 · Cited by 1,431
Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students
Barrera, M., Sandler, I. N., & Ramsay, T. B. (1981) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf00918174 · Cited by 1,217
Invisible support and adjustment to stress.
Bolger, N. P., Zuckerman, A., & Kessler, R. C. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.953 · Cited by 1,102
Social support: The sense of acceptance and the role of relationships.
Sarason, B. R., Pierce, G. R., & Sarason, I. G. (1990) · Cited by 399
Disability as a Function of Social Networks and Support in Elderly African Americans and Whites
de Leon, C. F. M., Gold, D. T., Glass, T. A., Kaplan, L., & George, L. K. (2001) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/56.3.s179 · Cited by 237
The Lighthouse handbook on vision impairment and visionrehabilitation.
Silverstone, B. (2000) · Cited by 188
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.953 · DOI · Paper page
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, 1975, Multidimensional functional assessment: The OARS methodology
- 10.1177/0145482X9809200106 · doi:10.1177/0145482x9809200106
- Horowitz, A., 2000, The lighthouse handbooks on vision impairment and vision rehabilitation, 1089
- 10.1177/073346480001900306 · doi:10.1177/073346480001900306
Cited by
Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 · Cited by 7,272
Uchino, B. N. (2009) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01122.x · Cited by 1,506
Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. S. (2006) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.07.001 · Cited by 1,011
Motivation in online learning: testing a model of self-determination theory
Chen, K.-C., & Jang, S.-J. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.011 · Cited by 955
Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T., & Layton, J. (2010) · SciVee · doi:10.4016/19865.01 · Cited by 613
Metadata
- Authors
- Reinhardt, J. P., Boerner, K., & Horowitz, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117-129
- ISSN
- 0265-4075 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3608
- OpenAlex
- W2165355601
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 9.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Good to have but not to use: Differential impact of perceived and received support on well-being. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0265407506060182
- The paper
- Reinhardt, J. P., Boerner, K., & Horowitz, A. (2006). Good to have but not to use: Differential impact of perceived and received support on well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407506060182
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
