Cited by 115Franchising Strategies and PerformanceEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesBusiness Strategy and Innovation

Examining Control and Autonomy in the Franchisor-Franchisee Relationship

Pizanti, Inbar, Lerner, Miri·2003·International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship

Abstract

This article examines the franchisor-franchisee relationship from two theoretical perspectives - agency theory and exchange theory. Taking the case of the fast-food industry in Israel, the research focuses on control and autonomy in a domestic hamburger chain - Burger Ranch - and two international chains - McDonald's and Burger King. The findings led to the design of a model that illustrates several aspects, such as the concept of franchising, the size and age of the chain, and the range of the contract, that relate to control and autonomy. The combination of agency theory and exchange theory enables us to focus on control and autonomy as multidimensional concepts, and to present various possibilities for judiciously balancing them. The case indicates that in some respects (e.g. master franchisee), the two global chains are more similar to each other than to the domestic chain. However, in other respects (e.g. size, growth rate), the domestic and one of the two global chains show more similarities than differences. The findings indicate different forms of integration of control and autonomy in the three chains.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0266242603021002001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large chains tend to provide greater autonomy to their franchisees.

    “Large chains tend to provide greater autonomy to their franchisees (Pizanti and Lerner, 2003).”

    From A systematic review of international franchising (2021) · cites this paper as Pizanti and Lerner, 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pizanti, I., & Lerner, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship
Published
2003-05
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
131-159
ISSN
  • 0266-2426 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2870
OpenAlex
W1971069445
Cited by
115
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Franchising Strategies and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
Keywords
franchisor-franchisee relationship, franchising, autonomy and control, agency theory, social exchange theory, fast food industry, McDonald's, Burger King, franchise agreements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review