The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions
Abstract
Many democratic nations are experiencing increased levels of false information circulating through social media and political websites that mimic journalism formats. In many cases, this disinformation is associated with the efforts of movements and parties on the radical right to mobilize supporters against centre parties and the mainstream press that carries their messages. The spread of disinformation can be traced to growing legitimacy problems in many democracies. Declining citizen confidence in institutions undermines the credibility of official information in the news and opens publics to alternative information sources. Those sources are often associated with both nationalist (primarily radical right) and foreign (commonly Russian) strategies to undermine institutional legitimacy and destabilize centre parties, governments and elections. The Brexit campaign in the United Kingdom and the election of Donald Trump in the United States are among the most prominent examples of disinformation campaigns intended to disrupt normal democratic order, but many other nations display signs of disinformation and democratic disruption. The origins of these problems and their implications for political communication research are explored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
FILTER BUBBLE: Wie wir im Internet entmündigt werden
Pariser, E. (2012) · doi:10.3139/9783446431164 · Cited by 1,849
The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes’ Steadfast Factual Adherence
Wood, T., & Porter, E. (2019) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-018-9443-y · Cited by 904
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Bennett WL, Journal of Communication
- 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1348533 · DOI
- Bounegru L, Gray J, Venturini T, et al. (2017) A field guide to fake news and other information disorders. Amsterdam: Public Data Lab. Available at: https://fakenews.publicdatalab.org/. · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Crouch C (2004) Post-democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
- Dorf MC, 2017, Journal of Constitutional Law, 20, 1
- 10.1111/cccr.12097 · DOI · Paper page
- Mair P, 2013, Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy
- Mayer J, 2016, Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right
- Mishra P, 2017, Age of Anger: A History of the Present
- OECD (2017) Trust and Public Policy: How Better Governance Can Help Rebuild Public Trust. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264268920-en. · DOI · Paper page
- Porta DD, 2017, Movement Parties Against Austerity
- Reinemann C, 2017, Populist Political Communication in Europe, 12
- 10.1017/S1537592716001122 · DOI · Paper page
- Wood T, 2018, Political Behavior, 1
- Zakaria F (1997) The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs, November/December. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/1997-11-01/rise-illiberal-democracy. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., Kendeou, P., Vraga, E. K., & Amazeen, M. A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y · Cited by 1,372
Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2020) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305120903408 · Cited by 978
“…disinformation and, if left unchallenged, could have profound implications for journalism, citizen competence, and the quality of democracy (Bennett & Livingston, 2018; Chadwick et al., 2018; Flynn et al., 2017; Rojecki & Meraz, 2016; Waisbord, 2018).2 This study provides the first…”
BackgroundJones-Jang, S. M., Mortensen, T., & Liu, J. (2021) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764219869406 · Cited by 685
Do (microtargeted) deepfakes have real effects on political attitudes?
Dobber, T., Metoui, N., Trilling, D., Helberger, N., & de Vreese, C. (2021) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161220944364 · Cited by 256
Zimmermann, F., & Kohring, M. (2020) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1686095 · Cited by 227
“The originators of disinformation take advantage of this development by creating “alternative information systems that block the mainstream press and provide followers with emotionally satisfying beliefs around which they can organize” (Bennett & Livingston, 2018, p. 132).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S.
- Venue
- European Journal of Communication
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 122-139
- ISSN
- 0267-3231 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3705
- OpenAlex
- W2796536780
- Cited by
- 1,552
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 290.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0267323118760317
- The paper
- Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.