Cited by 149Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Communication and Low Mood (CALM): a randomized controlled trial of behavioural therapy for stroke patients with aphasia

Open access
Thomas, Shirley A, Walker, Marion F, Macniven, Jamie A, Haworth, Helen, Lincoln, Nadina B·2013·Clinical Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to evaluate behavioural therapy as a treatment for low mood in people with aphasia. Design: A randomized controlled trial comparing behavioural therapy plus usual care with a usual care control. Potential participants with aphasia after stroke were screened for the presence of low mood. Those who met the criteria and gave consent were randomly allocated. Setting: Participants were recruited from hospital wards, community rehabilitation, speech and language therapy services and stroke groups. Subjects: Of 511 people with aphasia identified, 105 had low mood and were recruited. Interventions: Behavioural therapy was offered for up to three months. Outcomes were assessed three and six months after random allocation. Main measures: Stroke Aphasic Depression Questionnaire, Visual Analog Mood Scales ‘sad’ item, and Visual Analogue Self-Esteem Scale. Results: Participants were aged 29 to 94 years (mean 67.0, SD 13.5) and 66 (63%) were men. Regression analysis showed that at three months, when baseline values and communication impairment were controlled for, group allocation was a significant predictor of the Stroke Aphasic Depression Questionnaire ( P < 0.05), visual analogue ‘sad’ ( P = 0.03), and Visual Analogue Self-Esteem Scale ( P < 0.01). At six months, group alone was a significant predictor of the Stroke Aphasic Depression Questionnaire ( P < 0.05), and remained significant when baseline values were controlled for ( P = 0.02). Mean Stroke Aphasic Depression Questionnaire 10-item hospital version scores decreased from baseline to six months by six points in the intervention group as compared with an increase of 1.9 points in the control group. Conclusions: Behavioural therapy seemed to improve the mood of people with aphasia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269215512462227

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Behavioural therapy, compared with TAU in an RCT, produced significant improvements in self-reported and observer-rated mood and self-esteem at 3 months in stroke survivors with aphasia and low mood.

    “Behavioural therapy, compared with TAU in an RCT, produced significant improvements in self-reported and observer-rated mood and selfesteem at 3 months in stroke survivors with aphasia and low mood (Thomas, Walker, Macniven, Haworth, & Lincoln, 2013).”

    From Brief group‐based acceptance and commitment therapy for stroke survivors. (2019) · cites this paper as Thomas et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]Enderby P Wood V Wade D Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test. Oxford: Whurr Publishers, 1997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomas, S. A., Walker, M. F., Macniven, J. A., Haworth, H., & Lincoln, N. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Thomas, Shirley A
Venue
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2012-10-11
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
398-408
ISSN
  • 0269-2155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0873
OpenAlex
W2095758871
Cited by
149
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Rehabilitation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0512-10092)
  • Stroke Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
aphasia, stroke, depressive mood, behavior therapy, depression, self-esteem, communication disorders, mood
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aphasia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, ROC Curve, Self Concept, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Statistics, Nonparametric, Mood Disorders, Stroke, Visual Analog Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review