Cited by 157Palliative and Oncologic CarePatient-Provider Communication in HealthcarePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Effectiveness of a three-day communication skills course in changing nurses' communication skills with cancer/palliative care patients: a randomised controlled trial

Wilkinson, S, Perry, R, Blanchard, K, Linsell, L·2008·Palliative Medicine

Abstract

This multi-centre, two-armed parallel-group pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the effectiveness of a 3-day communication skills course in changing nurses' communication skills. The primary outcome was the change in the nurses' communication skills score from pre-course to 12 weeks post-course. The main secondary outcome was the change in the nurses' level of confidence in communicating with patients. A total of 172 nurses were randomised to the course or control. The communication skills score for the intervention group increased by 3.4 points post-course but decreased in the control by 0.05 points (between-group difference in change: 3.41, 95% CI: 2.16-4.66, P < 0.001). Confidence scores increased by 18.16 points for the intervention group but decreased 0.7 points in the control (between-group difference in change: 18.86, 95% CI: 13.39-24.34, P < 0.001). This RCT contributes to the evidence base on the effectiveness of communication skills training in cancer and palliative care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269216308090770

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wilkinson 2008 had a unique methodological issue whereby intervention nurses selected tapes to be assessed for quality of consultation process.

    “It had a unique a methodological issue whereby of several videotapes of patient visits, intervention nurses selected tapes to be assessed for quality of consultation process.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilkinson, S., Perry, R., Blanchard, K., & Linsell, L.
Affiliations
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Wilkinson, S
Venue
Palliative Medicine
Published
2008-06
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
365-375
ISSN
  • 0269-2163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-030X
OpenAlex
W2128301393
Cited by
157
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 18
FWCI
9.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Marie Curie
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
nurse-patient communication, communication skills training, nurses, cancer patients, palliative care, communication confidence, communication skills course
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Communication, Education, Nursing, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Nurse-Patient Relations, Palliative Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review