Cited by 49Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts

Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for improving outpatient neuropalliative care: A qualitative study of patient and caregiver perspectives

Open access
Macchi, Zachary A, Ayele, Roman, Dini, Megan, Lamira, Jensine, Katz, Maya, Pantilat, Steven Z, Jones, Jacqueline, Kluger, Benzi M·2021·Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 has impacted persons with serious illness, including those with chronic, neurodegenerative conditions. While there are several reports on COVID-19’s impact on inpatient palliative care, literature is limited about the impact on outpatient care which may be more relevant for these patients. Aim: To generate a person-centered description of the impact of COVID-19 from the perspectives of patients living with neurodegenerative disease and caregivers to improve outpatient palliative care delivery. Design: This qualitative study used rapid analysis via matrix design to identify emergent themes related to participant perspectives on the challenges of COVID-19. Data sources included semi-structured interviews, open-ended survey responses, medical record documentation and participant-researcher communications. Setting/Participants: Data was collected from 108 patients with Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease or related disorders and 90 caregivers enrolled in a multicenter, clinical trial of community-based, outpatient palliative care between March 20, 2020 and August 8, 2020 (NCT03076671). Results: Four main themes emerged: (1) disruptions to delivery of healthcare and other supportive services; (2) increased symptomatic and psychosocial needs; (3) increased caregiver burden; (4) limitations of telecommunications when compared to in-person contact. We observed that these themes interacted and intersected. Conclusions: Patients and caregivers have unmet care needs because of the pandemic, exacerbated by social isolation. While telemedicine has helped improve access to healthcare, patients and caregivers perceive clear limitations compared to in-person services. Changes in society and healthcare delivery in response to COVID-19 highlight ongoing and novel gaps that must be addressed to optimize future outpatient palliative care for neurologic illness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/02692163211017383

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The COVID-19 pandemic has created a crisis for dementia caregivers.

    “For these reasons the pandemic has created a crisis for dementia caregivers.604,610,611”

    From 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2023) · cites this paper as [610]

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [27]Helmich RC and Bloem BR. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Parkinson’s Disease: Hidden Sorrows and Emerging Opportunities. Journal of Parkinson’s disease 2020; 10: 351– 354. DOI: 10.3233/JPD-202038. PMC7242824 32250324 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [31]Kluger BM, Miyasaki J, Katz M, Comparison of Integrated Outpatient Palliative Care With Standard Care in Patients With Parkinson Disease and Related Disorders: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurology 2020; 77: 551– 560. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.4992. 32040141 PMC7042842 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Macchi, Z. A., Ayele, R., Dini, M., Lamira, J., Katz, M., Pantilat, S. Z., Jones, J., & Kluger, B. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Macchi, Zachary A
Venue
Palliative Medicine
Published
2021-05-18
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
1258-1266
ISSN
  • 0269-2163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-030X
OpenAlex
W3163145523
Cited by
49
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (K02AG062745, T32AG044296)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR016037)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, outpatient palliative care, neurodegenerative diseases, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, caregivers, caregiver burden, telemedicine, healthcare disruption, social isolation, psychosocial needs, person-centred care, community-based palliative care
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Ambulatory Care, Humans, Outpatients, Palliative Care, Caregivers, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review