Cited by 366Psychedelics and Drug StudiesParanormal Experiences and BeliefsReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Challenging Experience Questionnaire: Characterization of challenging experiences with psilocybin mushrooms

Open access

Abstract

Acute adverse psychological reactions to classic hallucinogens ("bad trips" or "challenging experiences"), while usually benign with proper screening, preparation, and support in controlled settings, remain a safety concern in uncontrolled settings (such as illicit use contexts). Anecdotal and case reports suggest potential adverse acute symptoms including affective (panic, depressed mood), cognitive (confusion, feelings of losing sanity), and somatic (nausea, heart palpitation) symptoms. Responses to items from several hallucinogen-sensitive questionnaires (Hallucinogen Rating Scale, the States of Consciousness Questionnaire, and the Five-Dimensional Altered States of Consciousness questionnaire) in an Internet survey of challenging experiences with the classic hallucinogen psilocybin were used to construct and validate a Challenging Experience Questionnaire. The stand-alone Challenging Experience Questionnaire was then validated in a separate sample. Seven Challenging Experience Questionnaire factors (grief, fear, death, insanity, isolation, physical distress, and paranoia) provide a phenomenological profile of challenging aspects of experiences with psilocybin. Factor scores were associated with difficulty, meaningfulness, spiritual significance, and change in well-being attributed to the challenging experiences. The factor structure did not differ based on gender or prior struggle with anxiety or depression. The Challenging Experience Questionnaire provides a basis for future investigation of predictors and outcomes of challenging experiences with classic hallucinogens.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881116678781

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 73 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Browne MW, 1993, Testing Structural Equation Models, 136
  2. Dittrich A, 1975, Z Klin Psychol Psychiatr Psychother, 23, 12
  3. Dittrich A, 2010, 5D-ASC: Questionnaire for the Assessment Of Altered States of Consciousness. A Short Introduction
  4. Freeman D, 2015, SchizophrBull, 41, 391
  5. Frecska E, 2006, Neuropsychopharmacol Hung, 8, 189
  6. Hübner C, 2007, Music Therapy Today, 8, 257
  7. Kline RB, 2005, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
  8. Metzner R, 1965, Psychedelic Review, 5, 3
  9. Pahnke WN, 1969, Curr Psychiatr Ther, 9, 144
  10. 10.1093/oso/9780195096736.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  11. R Core Team, 2012, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
  12. Rossell Y, 2012, J Stat Softw, 48, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–324 of 324

Metadata

Authors
Barrett, F. S., Bradstreet, M. P., Leoutsakos, J.-M. S., Johnson, M. W., & Griffiths, R. R.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Barrett, Frederick S
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2016-11-19
Volume
30
Issue
12
Pages
1279-1295
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2549202270
Cited by
366
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 3
FWCI
11.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA003889, T32DA007209)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
psilocybin, challenging experiences, bad trips, questionnaire validation, grief, fear, death, paranoia, isolation, physical distress, altered states of consciousness, meaningfulness, spiritual meaning, well-being
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Agaricales, Anxiety, Depression, Emotions, Female, Hallucinogens, Humans, Male, Psilocybin, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review