The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
State And Local E-Government: Prospects and Challenges
Abstract
This article presents a self-contained yet comprehensive discussion of the prospects of state and local electronic government (e-government), the status of its development across the states and local communities, and the difficult challenges faced in making it a reality. In taking a very broad approach to e-government, the hope is that the analysis helps to bring perspective to the issue and to synthesize a literature that is increasingly becoming a series of disconnected case studies. Although the prospects at all levels of government for improving public services, reducing costs, and enhancing the democratic process are high, e-government has been penetrating state government much more rapidly than local government. The most salient obstacles to full penetration of e-government seem to be proper marketing, privacy issues, equity, and financing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-2454 · Cited by 28,789
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
Nordhaus, W. D. (1975) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2296528 · Cited by 3,905
Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s0740-624x(01)00066-1 · Cited by 2,645
Equilibrium Political Budget Cycles
Rogoff, K. (1987) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w2428 · Cited by 1,877
Political Cycles in OECD Economies
Alesina, A., & Roubini, N. (1992) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297992 · Cited by 615
Falling through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide
Administration, N. T. A. I. (2001) · The Digital Divide · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2419.003.0006 · Cited by 495
Bridging the Racial Divide on the Internet
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5362.390 · Cited by 450
Inman, R. P., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1997) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.11.4.43 · Cited by 425
The Political Business Cycle: An Empirical Test
McCallum, B. T. (1978) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1057206 · Cited by 271
Cited by
E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations
Gil-García, J. R., & Pardo, T. A. (2005) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.001 · Cited by 960
The Evolution and Continuing Challenges of E‐Governance
Dawes, S. S. (2008) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00981.x · Cited by 478
The Myths of E-Government: Looking Beyond the Assumptions of a New and Better Government
Bekkers, V., & Homburg, V. (2007) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240701572913 · Cited by 332
Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Martinez-Moyano, I. J. (2007) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.04.005 · Cited by 288
Campos-Castillo, C. (2015) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439314547617 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Edmiston, K. D.
- Venue
- The American Review of Public Administration
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-45
- ISSN
- 0275-0740 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3357
- OpenAlex
- W2065109389
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 65.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: State And Local E-Government: Prospects and Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0275074002250255
- The paper
- Edmiston, K. D. (2003). State And Local E-Government: Prospects and Challenges. The American Review of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074002250255
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
