The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Media and the Coproduction of Safety: An Empirical Analysis of Dutch Practices
Open accessAbstract
The new media have been argued to strengthen the coproduction of safety by reducing the costs of interactions between government and citizens and providing new communicative potential. Does that lead to relevant additional input from citizens in police work? Or are preexisting interactions reproduced online? This empirical study of police practices in the Netherlands shows that new media indeed strengthen the coproduction of safety by enabling the police to reach more citizens and contact them 24/7. The police build new connections to citizens: mediated citizen networks form an important addition to offline networks. The costs are reduced most in a situation where new media replace face-to-face contacts between police and citizens, that is, in the coproduction of police patrol work. The article concludes that new media support the trend of responsibilization: the police use new media to build virtual networks with citizens and engage them anywhere and anytime in the coproduction of safety.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction
WALTHER, J. B. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023001001 · Cited by 4,798
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Aberdeen, T. (2013) · The Canadian Journal of Action Research · doi:10.33524/cjar.v14i1.73 · Cited by 3,250
The long tail: why the future of business is selling less of more
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2783 · Cited by 2,869
Information richness. A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1983) · doi:10.21236/ada128980 · Cited by 2,263
CONSUMERS AS COPRODUCERS OF PUBLIC SERVICES: SOME ECONOMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivort, M. B., Whitaker, G. P., & Wilson, R. (1981) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x · Cited by 761
Cited by
A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach
Kok, G., Gottlieb, N. H., Peters, G.-J. Y., Mullen, P. D., Parcel, G. S., Ruiter, R. A. C., Fernández, M. E., Markham, C., & Bartholomew, L. K. (2016) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2015.1077155 · Cited by 1,137
Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: can policy support programs help?
Hudson, B., Hunter, D., & Peckham, S. (2019) · Policy Design and Practice · doi:10.1080/25741292.2018.1540378 · Cited by 721
Bonsón, E., Royo, S., & Ratkai, M. (2015) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.11.001 · Cited by 503
Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction
Winch, G. (1998) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/096132198369751 · Cited by 339
Internal and External Antecedents of Process Innovation: A review and extension
Walker, R. M. (2014) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.771698 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Meijer, A. J.
- Venue
- The American Review of Public Administration
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-08-29
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-34
- ISSN
- 0275-0740 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3357
- OpenAlex
- W2074642238
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 240.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Media and the Coproduction of Safety: An Empirical Analysis of Dutch Practices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0275074012455843
- The paper
- Meijer, A. J. (2014). New Media and the Coproduction of Safety: An Empirical Analysis of Dutch Practices. The American Review of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012455843
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
