The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Swine as Models in Biomedical Research and Toxicology Testing
Abstract
Swine are considered to be one of the major animal species used in translational research, surgical models, and procedural training and are increasingly being used as an alternative to the dog or monkey as the choice of nonrodent species in preclinical toxicologic testing of pharmaceuticals. There are unique advantages to the use of swine in this setting given that they share with humans similar anatomic and physiologic characteristics involving the cardiovascular, urinary, integumentary, and digestive systems. However, the investigator needs to be familiar with important anatomic, histopathologic, and clinicopathologic features of the laboratory pig and minipig in order to put background lesions or xenobiotically induced toxicologic changes in their proper perspective and also needs to consider specific anatomic differences when using the pig as a surgical model. Ethical considerations, as well as the existence of significant amounts of background data, from a regulatory perspective, provide further support for the use of this species in experimental or pharmaceutical research studies. It is likely that pigs and minipigs will become an increasingly important animal model for research and pharmaceutical development applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2010 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
WRITING GROUP MEMBERS, Lloyd-Jones, D., Adams, R. J., Brown, T. M., Carnethon, M., Dai, S., De Simone, G., Ferguson, T. B., Ford, E., Furie, K., et al. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.192667 · Cited by 5,700
Cited by
The pig: a model for human infectious diseases
Meurens, F., Summerfield, A., Nauwynck, H., Saif, L., & Gerdts, V. (2012) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2011.11.002 · Cited by 999
Polymeric hydrogel systems as emerging biomaterial platforms to enable hemostasis and wound healing
Pourshahrestani, S., Zeimaran, E., Kadri, N. A., Mutlu, N., & Boccaccini, A. R. (2020) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202000905 · Cited by 448
The porcine innate immune system: an update
Mair, K. H., Sedlak, C., Käser, T., Pasternak, A., Levast, B., Gerner, W., Saalmüller, A., Summerfield, A., Gerdts, V., Wilson, H. L., et al. (2014) · Developmental & Comparative Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.dci.2014.03.022 · Cited by 264
Yan, H., Diao, H., Xiao, Y., Li, W., Yu, B., He, J., Yu, J., Zheng, P., Mao, X., Luo, Y., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep31786 · Cited by 138
Conformable hybrid systems for implantable bioelectronic interfaces
Fallegger, F., Schiavone, G., & Lacour, S. P. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201903904 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Swindle, M. M., Makin, A., Herron, A. J., Clubb, F. J., & Frazier, K. S.
- Venue
- Veterinary Pathology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-03-25
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 344-356
- ISSN
- 0300-9858 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-2217
- OpenAlex
- W2112080359
- Cited by
- 1,357
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 42.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Swine as Models in Biomedical Research and Toxicology Testing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0300985811402846
- The paper
- Swindle, M. M., Makin, A., Herron, A. J., Clubb, F. J., & Frazier, K. S. (2012). Swine as Models in Biomedical Research and Toxicology Testing. Veterinary Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985811402846
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.