Cited by 33Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchNeuroscience and Music PerceptionWilliams Syndrome Research

Auditory Pitch Perception in Autism Spectrum Disorder Is Associated With Nonverbal Abilities

Chowdhury, Rakhee, Sharda, Megha, Foster, Nicholas E. V., Germain, Esther, Tryfon, Ana, Doyle-Thomas, Krissy, Anagnostou, Evdokia, Hyde, Krista L.·2017·Perception

Abstract

Atypical sensory perception and heterogeneous cognitive profiles are common features of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, previous findings on auditory sensory processing in ASD are mixed. Accordingly, auditory perception and its relation to cognitive abilities in ASD remain poorly understood. Here, children with ASD, and age- and intelligence quotient (IQ)-matched typically developing children, were tested on a low- and a higher level pitch processing task. Verbal and nonverbal cognitive abilities were measured using the Wechsler’s Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. There were no group differences in performance on either auditory task or IQ measure. However, there was significant variability in performance on the auditory tasks in both groups that was predicted by nonverbal, not verbal skills. These results suggest that auditory perception is related to nonverbal reasoning rather than verbal abilities in ASD and typically developing children. In addition, these findings provide evidence for preserved pitch processing in school-age children with ASD with average IQ, supporting the idea that there may be a subgroup of individuals with ASD that do not present perceptual or cognitive difficulties. Future directions involve examining whether similar perceptual-cognitive relationships might be observed in a broader sample of individuals with ASD, such as those with language impairment or lower IQ.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0301006617718715

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Chowdhury, R., Sharda, M., Foster, N. E. V., Germain, E., Tryfon, A., Doyle-Thomas, K., Anagnostou, E., & Hyde, K. L.
Affiliations
  • International Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research (CA)
  • Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Sharda, Megha
Venue
Perception
Published
2017-07-06
Volume
46
Issue
11
Pages
1298-1320
ISSN
  • 0301-0066 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4233
OpenAlex
W2726658222
Cited by
33
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perception (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, nonverbal reasoning, verbal ability, auditory sensory processing, cognitive ability, typically developing children, elementary school students
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Child, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Pitch Perception, Thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review