Cited by 163Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchWilliams Syndrome ResearchDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Visuo-Spatial Performance in Autism: A Meta-analysis

Muth, Anne, Hönekopp, Johannes, Falter, Christine M.·2014·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Visuo-spatial skills are believed to be enhanced in autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). This meta-analysis tests the current state of evidence for Figure Disembedding, Block Design, Mental Rotation and Navon tasks in ASD and neurotypicals. Block Design (d = 0.32) and Figure Disembedding (d = 0.26) showed superior performance for ASD with large heterogeneity that is unaccounted for. No clear differences were found for Mental Rotation. ASD samples showed a stronger local processing preference for Navon tasks (d = 0.35); less clear evidence for performance differences of a similar magnitude emerged. We discuss the meta-analysis results together with other findings relating to visuo-spatial processing and three cognitive theories of ASD: Weak Central Coherence, Enhanced Perceptual Functioning and Extreme Male Brain theory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-014-2188-5

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An increasing number of studies show that autistic people outperform nonautistic people on a variety of tasks.

    “An increasing number of studies show that while autistic people outperform nonautistic people on a variety of tasks (e.g. Muth, Honekopp, & Falter, 2014; Remington & Fairnie, 2017; Samson, Mottron, Soulieres, & Zeffiro, 2012), these strengths are very rarely considered in the profile of autism (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).”

    From Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science (2022) · cites this paper as Muth, Honekopp, & Falter, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 100 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muth, A., Hönekopp, J., & Falter, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • Northumbria University (GB)
  • University Hospital Cologne (DE)
Corresponding author
Muth, Anne
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2014-07-15
Volume
44
Issue
12
Pages
3245-3263
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2082445603
Cited by
163
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 16
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, visuospatial ability, block designs, mental rotation, Navon task, weak central coherence, extreme male brain theory
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Child, Humans, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review