The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Co-becoming Bawaka: Towards a relational understanding of place/space
Abstract
We invite readers to dig for ganguri (yams) at and with Bawaka, an Indigenous Homeland in northern Australia, and, in doing so, consider an Indigenous-led understanding of relational space/place. We draw on the concept of gurrutu to illustrate the limits of western ontologies, open up possibilities for other ways of thinking and theorizing, and give detail and depth to the notion of space/place as emergent co-becoming. With Bawaka as lead author, we look to Country for what it can teach us about how all views of space are situated, and for the insights it offers about co-becoming in a relational world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2010) · Sociology for Pharmacists · doi:10.4324/9780203381175_chapter_9 · Cited by 14,152
Hepburn, R. W., Heidegger, M., Macquarrie, J., & Robinson, E. (1927) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 12,201
8 Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2024) · Foundational Concepts of Decolonial and Southern Epistemologies · doi:10.21832/9781800418868-012 · Cited by 9,810
Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference
Wong, R. B., & Chakrabarty, D. (2001) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/2692957 · Cited by 9,382
Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
Hall, T. D., & Smith, L. T. (2000) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2653993 · Cited by 7,420
Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity
Mitchell, T. (2002) · doi:10.1525/9780520928251 · Cited by 3,693
Reichert, H. W., Heidegger, M., & Hofstadter, A. (1972) · Books Abroad · doi:10.2307/40126613 · Cited by 3,373
(2010) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822393047 · Cited by 2,043
Intensities of feeling: towards a spatial politics of affect
Thrift, N. (2004) · Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography · doi:10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00154.x · Cited by 1,919
New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics
(2010) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822392996 · Cited by 1,880
Cited by
Geography and indigeneity I: Indigeneity, coloniality and knowledge
Radcliffe, S. A. (2017) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132515612952 · Cited by 163
Fourth VR: Indigenous virtual reality practice
Wallis, K., & Ross, M. (2021) · Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/1354856520943083 · Cited by 40
An Archaeology Led by Strawberries
Atalay, S. (2020) · Archaeologies of the Heart · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-36350-5_16 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Country, B., Wright, S., Suchet-Pearson, S., Lloyd, K., Burarrwanga, L., Ganambarr, R., Ganambarr-Stubbs, M., Ganambarr, B., Maymuru, D., & Sweeney, J.
- Venue
- Progress in Human Geography
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-06-30
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 455-475
- ISSN
- 0309-1325 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0288
- OpenAlex
- W2337575045
- Cited by
- 585
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 80.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Co-becoming Bawaka: Towards a relational understanding of place/space. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0309132515589437
- The paper
- Country, B., Wright, S., Suchet-Pearson, S., Lloyd, K., Burarrwanga, L., Ganambarr, R., Ganambarr-Stubbs, M., Ganambarr, B., Maymuru, D., & Sweeney, J. (2016). Co-becoming Bawaka: Towards a relational understanding of place/space. Progress in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515589437
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
