The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic geographies of climate change: Science, space and politics
Open accessAbstract
Anthropogenic climate change has been presented as the archetypal global problem, identified by the slow work of assembling a global knowledge infrastructure, and demanding a concertedly global political response. But this ‘global’ knowledge has distinctive geographies, shaped by histories of exploration and colonialism, by diverse epistemic and material cultures of knowledge-making, and by the often messy processes of linking scientific knowledge to decision-making within different polities. We suggest that understanding of the knowledge politics of climate change may benefit from engagement with literature on the geographies of science. We review work from across the social sciences which resonates with geographers’ interests in the spatialities of scientific knowledge, to build a picture of what we call the epistemic geographies of climate change. Moving from the field site and the computer model to the conference room and international political negotiations, we examine the spatialities of the interactional co-production of knowledge and social order. In so doing, we aim to proffer a new approach to the intersections of space, knowledge and power which can enrich geography’s engagements with the politics of a changing climate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory
Latour, B. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 · Cited by 16,778
Callon, M. (1984) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.1984.tb00113.x · Cited by 7,763
Foucault, M., & Miskowiec, J. (1986) · Diacritics · doi:10.2307/464648 · Cited by 5,636
Why has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern
Latour, B. (2004) · Critical Inquiry · doi:10.1086/421123 · Cited by 5,595
Gieryn, T. F. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095325 · Cited by 4,838
(2004) · doi:10.4324/9780203413845 · Cited by 2,963
The trouble with negative emissions
Anderson, K., & Peters, G. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aah4567 · Cited by 1,252
Putting Science in Its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge
Livingstone, D. N. (2003) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226487243.001.0001 · Cited by 953
The construction of global warming and the politics of science
Demeritt, D. (2001) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00245 · Cited by 729
Policy: Climate advisers must maintain integrity
Geden, O. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/521027a · Cited by 109
Cited by
Latulippe, N., & Klenk, N. (2020) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.10.010 · Cited by 523
The IPCC and the new map of science and politics
Beck, S., & Mahony, M. (2018) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.547 · Cited by 294
Self-citationEpistemic Borderwork: Violent Pushbacks, Refugees, and the Politics of Knowledge at the EU Border
Davies, T., Isakjee, A., & Obradovic-Wochnik, J. (2023) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2022.2077167 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahony, M., & Hulme, M.
- Venue
- Progress in Human Geography
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-12-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 395-424
- ISSN
- 0309-1325 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0288
- OpenAlex
- W2560541126
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 68.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epistemic geographies of climate change: Science, space and politics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0309132516681485
- The paper
- Mahony, M., & Hulme, M. (2018). Epistemic geographies of climate change: Science, space and politics. Progress in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516681485
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.