Cited by 20scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Writing and PublishingAcademic integrity and plagiarism

Referencing practices in physical geography: How well do we cite what we write?

Open access
Haussmann, Natalie Suzette, McIntyre, Trevor, Bumby, Adam John, Loubser, Michael John·2013·Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment

Abstract

Accurate citation practices are important, from both an ethical and a scientific point of view. Using an easily reproducible, previously published method, we assess citation accuracy in 120 articles published in the first half of 2011 and listed under ‘Physical Geography’ in Thomson Reuters’ ISI Web of Knowledge Science Citation Index. Our results indicate that at least 19% of citations in physical geography do not provide clear support for the statements they are meant to support. These results are in line with previously published findings for ‘field-orientated’ sciences. We propose that both authors and editors help remedy this problem, by employing more rigorous writing and editing practices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0309133313482135

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A similar picture emerges from studies in marine biology, geography, and veterinary medicine.

    “A similar picture emerges from studies in the fields of marine biology (Todd et al., 2010), geography (Haussmann et al., 2013), and veterinary medicine (Hinchcliff et al., 1993).”

    From Quotation accuracy in medical journal articles—a systematic review and meta-analysis (2015) · cites this paper as Haussmann et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haussmann, N. S., McIntyre, T., Bumby, A. J., & Loubser, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Pretoria (ZA)
Corresponding author
Haussmann, Natalie Suzette
Venue
Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment
Published
2013-03-27
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
543-549
ISSN
  • 0309-1333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0296
OpenAlex
W2047648336
Cited by
20
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment (publishedVersion)
  • UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Pretoria
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
Keywords
citation accuracy, physical geography, scientific integrity, editorial practice, academic writing, ISI Web of Knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review