Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 78Transportation and Mobility InnovationsTransportation Planning and OptimizationHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Factors Affecting the Adoption of Autonomous Vehicles for Commute Trips: An Analysis with the 2015 and 2017 Puget Sound Travel Surveys

Wang, Kailai, Akar, Gulsah·2019·Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Abstract

The emergence of autonomous vehicles (AVs) may shape the future landscape of urban mobility. Although there is a growing literature on public opinions with regard to self-driving, little attention has been explicitly given to the commuters and their preferences for their commute trips. Using data from the 2015 and 2017 Puget Sound Regional Household Travel Studies, this study investigates the factors associated with employees’ propensity for using AVs. We develop a bivariate ordered probit model to jointly estimate the determinants of levels of interest in (i) commuting alone using AVs and (ii) commuting with others using shared AVs. Not surprisingly, it was found that current solo drivers are more likely to commute alone using AVs compared with other mode users. Significant differences were not found between current drivers and other commuters when it comes to the potential use of shared AVs. The results also reveal that, controlling for other factors, commuters surveyed in 2017 are less likely to be interested in shared AVs compared with their 2015 counterparts. The conclusion is that more planning efforts are needed to support the market penetration of shared AVs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0361198118822293

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Steck F., Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018
  2. Kornhauser A., 2013, Uncongested Mobility for All, While Improving Safety, Energy, and Environmental Consequences: New Jersey’s Area-Wide aTaxi System
  3. Greenblatt J. B., Shaheen S. Automated Vehicles, On-Demand Mobility, and Environmental Impacts. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40518-015-0038-5. Accessed July 28, 2018. · DOI · Paper page
  4. McKenzie B., 2011, Commuting in the United States: 2009
  5. Menon N., 2018, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 1
  6. Abraham H., 2017, Presented at 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board
  7. Howard D., 2014, Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board
  8. Sener I. N., 2018, Presented at 97th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board
  9. Lavasani M., 2017, Presented at 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board
  10. Nair G. S., 2018, Transportation, 45, 1623
  11. Greene W. H., 2009, Modelling ordered choices

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wang, K., & Akar, G.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Kailai
Venue
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2019-01-19
Volume
2673
Issue
2
Pages
13-25
ISSN
  • 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-4052
OpenAlex
W2909094704
Cited by
70
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, shared autonomous vehicles, technology adoption, commuting behavior, mode choice, Puget Sound, travel surveys, market penetration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.