Cited by 60Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesTendon Structure and TreatmentFoot and Ankle Surgery

The Elongation Behavior of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft in Vivo: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

Beynnon, Bruce D., Uh, Benjamin S., Johnson, Robert J., Fleming, Braden C., Renström, Per A., Nichols, Claude E.·2001·The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

The relationship between the elongation values of an autogenous bone-patellar tendon-bone graft immediately after fixation and the anterior-posterior laxity of the knee 5 years later was studied in vivo. Immediately after fixation, the change in the graft midsubstance length during passive knee flexion-extension was measured using a Hall-effect transducer, and anterior-posterior knee laxity was measured with the KT-1000 arthrometer. Subjects were divided into group 1 (N=6), with graft elongation values bounded by the 95% confidence intervals of the normal anterior cruciate ligament elongation values, and group 2 (N=7), subjects with values outside these intervals. Immediately after reconstruction, the side-to-side difference in anterior-posterior laxity between the reconstructed and uninjured knees was not different between group 1 (2.6±0.7 mm, mean SEM) and group 2 (1.7±1.0 mm) (P 0.49). At 5-year follow-up, the difference was 1.2±0.7 mm for group 1, while for group 2 it was significantly greater at 4.7±0.6 mm (P<0.004). At surgery, graft elongation values produced by flexion of the knee that are outside the limits of the anterior cruciate ligament result in significant increases in anterior knee laxity at long-term follow-up, while grafts with elongation values similar to the normal anterior cruciate ligament do not. Not only is restoration of anterior-posterior laxity values to within normal limits important, but the biomechanical behavior of the graft produced by flexion-extension of the knee should be appreciated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/03635465010290020801

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beynnon, B. D., Uh, B. S., Johnson, R. J., Fleming, B. C., Renström, P. A., & Nichols, C. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2001-03
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
161-166
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
OpenAlex
W2148565119
Cited by
60
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (5 T32 AR 07568, T32AR007568)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, graft elongation, knee laxity, graft biomechanics, long-term follow-up, Hall effect transducers, KT-1000 arthrometer
MeSH terms
Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Joint Instability, Male, Postoperative Complications, Tendons, Time Factors, Transplantation, Autologous, Bone Transplantation, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review