Cited by 110Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesFoot and Ankle SurgeryTendon Structure and Treatment

The effect of femoral attachment location on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: graft tension patterns and restoration of normal anterior–posterior laxity patterns

Zavras, T. Dionyssios, Race, Amos, Amis, Andrew A.·2005·Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Abstract

The issue of the best place to attach an anterior cruciate ligament graft to the femur is controversial, and different anatomic or isometric points have been recommended. It was hypothesised that one attachment site could be identified that would be best for restoring normal anterior–posterior laxity throughout the range of knee flexion. It was also hypothesised that these different attachment sites would cause different graft tension patterns during knee flexion. Using six cadaver knees, an isometric point was found 3 mm distal to the posterior edge of Blumensaat's line, at the 10:30–11:00 o'clock position in right knees, at the antero‐proximal edge of the anatomic ACL attachment. Anterior–posterior laxity was measured at ±150 N draw force at 20–120° flexion with the knee intact and after anterior cruciate ligament transection. The graft was placed at the isometric point, and AP laxity was restored to normal at 20° flexion, then measured at other angles. Graft tension was measured throughout, and also during passive flexion–extension. This was repeated for four other graft positions around the isometric point in every knee. Laxity was restored best by grafts tensioned to a mean of 9±14 N, positioned isometrically and 3 mm posterior to the isometric point. Their tension remained low until terminal extension. Grafts 3 mm anterior to the isometric point caused significant overconstraint, and had higher tension beyond 80° knee flexion. Small changes in attachment site had large effects on laxity and tension patterns. These results support an isometric/posterior anatomic femoral graft attachment, which restored knee laxity to normal from 20 to 120° flexion and did not induce high graft tension as the knee flexed. Grafts attached to the roof of the intercondylar notch caused overconstraint and higher tension in the flexed knee.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00167-004-0541-5

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zavras, T. D., Race, A., & Amis, A. A.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Amis, Andrew A.
Venue
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-12-10
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
92-100
ISSN
  • 0942-2056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7347
OpenAlex
W1971259732
Cited by
110
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, graft tension, anterior-posterior laxity, Blumensaat's line, knee flexion, intercondylar notch, cadaveric knee
MeSH terms
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cadaver, Femur, Humans, Joint Instability, Knee Injuries, Range of Motion, Articular, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Tissue Transplantation, Orthopedic Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review