Cited by 182Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesTendon Structure and TreatmentLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

In Vivo Elongation of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Posterior Cruciate Ligament during Knee Flexion

Li, Guoan, DeFrate, Louis E., Sun, Hao, Gill, Thomas J.·2004·The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background: Most knowledge regarding cruciate ligament function is based on in vitro experiments. Purpose: To investigate the in vivo elongation of the functional bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament during weightbearing flexion. Hypothesis: The biomechanical role of functional bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament under in vivo loading is different from that measured in cadavers. Study Design: In vivo biomechanical study. Methods: Elongation of the anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament was measured during a quasi-static lunge using imaging and 3-dimensional computer-modeling techniques. Results: The anterior-medial bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament had a relatively constant length from full extension to 90° of flexion. The posterior-lateral bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament decreased in length with flexion. Both bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament had increased lengths with flexion. Conclusion: The data did not demonstrate the reciprocal function of the 2 bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament or the posterior cruciate ligament with flexion observed in previous studies. Instead, the data suggest that there is a reciprocal function between the anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament with flexion. The anterior cruciate ligament plays a more important role in low-flexion angles, whereas the posterior cruciate ligament plays a more important role in high flexion. Clinical Relevance: Understanding the biomechanical role of the knee ligaments in vivo is essential to reproduce the structural behavior of the ligament after injury (especially for 2-bundle reconstructions) and thus improve surgical outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0363546503262175

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, G., DeFrate, L. E., Sun, H., & Gill, T. J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Guoan
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2004-09
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
1415-1420
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
OpenAlex
W2050751779
Cited by
182
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, ligament elongation, knee flexion, lunge, knee biomechanics, ligament injury, ligament reconstruction
MeSH terms
Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Computer Simulation, Humans, Knee Injuries, Knee Joint, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Movement, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Posterior Cruciate Ligament, Weight-Bearing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review