Cited by 10Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Quantifying Clinically Significant Change: A Brief Review of Methods and Presentation of a Hybrid Approach

Mann, Barton J., Gosens, Taco, Lyman, Stephen·2012·The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Treatment outcome researchers in orthopaedics frequently report only tests of statistical significance between group means to evaluate the effectiveness of a given intervention. Although important in establishing that mean differences are not caused by chance, these methods do not reflect the extent to which an intervention produces improvements that are meaningful and represent a return to health. This is an issue that is often of great interest to patients and clinicians. Other methods use a percentage change in an outcome measure (eg, 25% reduction in pain score) to classify treatment responders but often do not indicate whether the treatment restored a patient to normal. Researchers have developed several indices that provide a metric for statistically defining the amount of change that patients consider to be important. In this article, we focus on the concept of "clinical significance" and the different methods that have been developed to define clinically significant change using statistics. We then present a hybrid method that can classify whether a patient has returned to normal function. We apply this method to real patient data to illustrate its use with different outcome instruments commonly used in orthopaedic sports medicine. We advocate that the addition of these methods to reports from clinical outcome studies can deepen our understanding of the impact of interventions on patients' lives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0363546512457346

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mann, B. J., Gosens, T., & Lyman, S.
Affiliations
  • American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (US)
  • Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • Hospital for Special Surgery (US)
Corresponding author
Mann, Barton J.
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2012-09-07
Volume
40
Issue
10
Pages
2385-2393
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
OpenAlex
W2122788751
Cited by
10
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
clinically significant change, minimal clinically important difference, treatment response classification, orthopaedic sports medicine, patient-reported outcome measures, treatment outcome reporting, hybrid classifier
MeSH terms
Humans, Joint Diseases, Models, Theoretical, Psychometrics, Treatment Outcome, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review