Cited by 195Memory Processes and InfluencesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory, History, Trauma, Identity

Debunking Myths about Trauma and Memory

Open access
McNally, Richard J·2005·The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

How trauma victims remember—or forget—their most horrific experiences lies at the heart of the most bitter controversy in psychiatry and psychology in recent times. Whereas experts maintain that traumatic events—those experienced as overwhelmingly terrifying at the time of their occurrence—are remembered all too well, traumatic amnesia theorists disagree. Although these theorists acknowledge that trauma is often seemingly engraved on memory, they nevertheless maintain that a significant minority of survivors are incapable of remembering their trauma, thanks to mechanisms of either dissociation or repression. Unfortunately, the evidence they adduce in support of the concept of traumatic dissociative amnesia fails to support their claims. The purpose of this review is to dispel confusions and debunk myths regarding trauma and memory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/070674370505001302

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reconstructive and changing nature of memory challenges the idea that fragmentation is unique to trauma, because all memories are expected to be recounted with varying detail and coherence over time.

    “Furthermore, the reconstructive, changing nature of memory (e.g., Schacter, 1996) challenges the notion that fragmentation is unique to trauma, as it is expected that all memories will be recounted with varying detail and coherence over time (McNally, 2005).”

    From Dissociation and memory fragmentation in post-traumatic stress disorder: An evaluation of the dissociative encoding hypothesis (2012) · cites this paper as McNally, 2005

    In “Memory Does Not Operate Like a Videotape Recorder” (page unavailable), McNally says all recollection is reconstructive and no memory is immune to change over time. “Confusion About Repetition, Emotional Arousal, and Memory” adds that details of similar events may blur. The paper does not establish that all memories will be recounted with varying coherence over time. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. McNally RJ. Remembering trauma. Cambridge (MA): Belknap Press, Harvard University Press; 2003.
  2. Spiegel D. Foreword. In: Spiegel D, editor. Repressed memories. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Press; 1997. p 5-11.
  3. Bloom SL. Hearing the survivor's voice: sundering the wall of denial. J Psychohistory 1994;21:461-77.
  4. Clancy SA, McNally RJ. Recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse: forgetting as a consequence of voluntary suppression. Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice. Forthcoming.
  5. William James Hall, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 e-mail: rjm@wjh.harvard.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McNally, R. J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
McNally, Richard J
Venue
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2005-11
Volume
50
Issue
13
Pages
817-822
ISSN
  • 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1497-0015
OpenAlex
W2121060610
Cited by
195
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh061268-04)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 61268)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
Keywords
traumatic amnesia, dissociative amnesia, repression, dissociation, traumatic memory, trauma survivors, memory and forgetting
MeSH terms
Amnesia, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Dissociative Disorders, Humans, Repression, Psychology, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review