Cited by 24Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Neural correlates of experimental trauma memory retrieval

Open access
Gvozdanovic, Geraldine A., Stämpfli, Philipp, Seifritz, Erich, Rasch, Björn·2017·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Objectives: Traumatic memories such as intrusions and flashbacks play a major role in the development and maintenance of post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A thorough understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying traumatic memories is indispensable for precise diagnosis, for personalized treatment and prevention. In particular, the identification of early neural predictor variables for intrusion development shortly after trauma exposure requires detailed investigation. Experimental design: Here, we examined the neural correlates of early experimental trauma memory retrieval in a traumatic film paradigm in 42 young healthy females, using both implicit and explicit retrieval tasks. Principal observations: We show that implicit experimental trauma retrieval specifically involved the retrosplenial cortex and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), while both retrieval tasks resulted in trauma‐related activity in the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and the precuneus. Importantly, neural activity early after experimental trauma exposure predicted later intrusion development, with independent contributions from activity in the retrosplenial cortex (implicit retrieval) and the PCC (explicit retrieval). Additional analyses revealed a stronger connectivity between the bilateral amygdala and the supplementary motor area, precentral and paracentral lobule for the control group compared to the experimental trauma group. Conclusions: Our study gives new insights in the neural correlates of experimental trauma memory retrieval and their predictive value for subsequent symptom development. Our results could provide the basis for personalized early treatment and prevention of PTSD. Hum Brain Mapp, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Hum Brain Mapp 38:3592–3602, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This fMRI study in 42 healthy females used a trauma-film paradigm to compare implicit and explicit experimental trauma memory retrieval and test whether early retrieval-related activity predicts later intrusive memories. Implicit retrieval involved retrosplenial cortex and ACC, both tasks involved PCC/precuneus, and retrosplenial cortex (implicit) plus PCC (explicit) independently predicted intrusions over seven days.

Key findings

  • The trauma-film group rated neutral film pictures as more arousing and negatively valenced than the control group (t(40)=3.5, P=0.001) and reported significantly more intrusions over the 7-day diary period; Sternberg task performance did not differ between groups or picture types (all P>0.10).
  • Implicit experimental trauma retrieval was associated with increased activity in retrosplenial cortex/precuneus, PCC, and ACC (p FWE.cluster<0.05); explicit retrieval showed increased activity in PCC and precuneus. No control > trauma activations were observed in either task.
  • Stepwise regression showed that retrosplenial cortex activity during implicit retrieval predicted later intrusions (R²=0.263) and PCC activity during explicit retrieval independently predicted later intrusions (R²=0.152); combined prediction was stronger (R²=0.452), with negative partial correlations reported (r=-0.467 and r=-0.570; both P<0.05).
  • PPI analyses found stronger bilateral amygdala connectivity with supplementary motor area, precentral, and paracentral lobule for film > scrambled pictures in the control group compared with the experimental trauma group (p FWE.cluster<0.05); explicit PCC-seed connectivity was also stronger in control > trauma for temporal lobe and supramarginal gyrus.

Methods

  • Forty-five healthy, nonsmoking, right-handed females were screened; 3 were excluded, leaving 42 (mean age 23.3, range 19–33). Participants were assigned between-subjects to a trauma film (n=21) or neutral film (n=21); 100 min later they completed an implicit Sternberg task with emotional distractors followed by an explicit script-driven imagery task during fMRI, then a 7-day intrusion diary.
  • fMRI was performed on a Philips Achieva 3.0T scanner; preprocessing and analysis used SPM8. Second-level random-effects analyses used p FWE.cluster<0.05 with a cluster-defining threshold of P=0.001.
  • PPI analyses used seeds from group results plus hippocampus and amygdala ROIs; brain-behavior prediction used stepwise linear regression with sum of intrusions as the dependent variable and activity peaks from implicit and explicit tasks as predictors.

Limitations

  • Stated: only healthy participants were studied; the experimental trauma resembles witnessing trauma; patient samples may show additional and stronger neural correlates; longitudinal replication through full PTSD manifestation is needed; pre-trauma functional/structural differences and encoding differences were not addressed; no dissociation scales were measured to support the amygdala–SMA interpretation; the connectivity decrease was observed only in the control > experimental trauma contrast and cannot be uniquely ascribed to the trauma film.
  • Evident from the text: the sample was all female and modest in size (n=42; 21 per group), and later intrusions were assessed by self-report diary, limiting generalizability and measurement precision.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.23613

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 40 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    In the explicit script-driven imagery task, brain activation was higher in the experimental trauma group than in the neutral group.

    “Interestingly, also in the explicit memory retrieval task (script-driven imagery), brain activation was increased in the experimental trauma group compared to the neutral group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The neutral film is assumed to be an appropriate control for the trauma film.
  • Findingown data

    In explicit retrieval, the left and right precuneus and the PCC were among the regions partly similar to those in implicit retrieval (P<0.05, FWE-corrected at cluster level).

    “Importantly, brain regions were partly similar to the implicit retrieval task, including the left and right precuneus and the PCC (P < 0.05, family-wise error corrected for multiple comparisons on the cluster level (CDT of P 5 0.001), see Fig. 2C,D and Table II).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The neutral film is assumed to be an appropriate control for the trauma film.
  • Findingown data

    Further analyses indicated that the control group had stronger coupling than the experimental trauma group between the bilateral amygdala and three motor-related regions: the supplementary motor area, precentral and paracentral lobule.

    “Additional analyses revealed a stronger connectivity between the bilateral amygdala and the supplementary motor area, precentral and paracentral lobule for the control group compared to the experimental trauma group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Subjective valence and arousal ratings for negative, neutral, and scrambled pictures did not differ significantly between the trauma film and control groups (all P>0.10).

    “Subjective valence and arousal ratings did not differ significantly between the experimental trauma and the control group for negative, neutral and scrambled pictures (all P > 0.10).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Implicit retrieval of experimental trauma memories was associated with increased activity in the retrosplenial cortex/precuneus, PCC, and ACC (all P<0.05, FWE-corrected at cluster level).

    “In accordance with previous studies in PTSD patients, implicit retrieval of experimental trauma memories was associated with robustly increased brain activity in the retrosplenial cortex/precuneus, PCC and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC, all P < 0.05, family-wise error corrected for multiple comparisons for the whole brain on cluster level; see Fig. 2A,B and Table I).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The emotional distractors in the Sternberg task are assumed to trigger only implicit memories of the film.
  • May combine two claims. 31
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 20
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the contrast of experimental trauma > control and film pictures > negative IAPS pictures, the retrosplenial cortex and precuneus remained significantly different, but the PCC and ACC were not found.

    “When looking at experimental trauma > control group and specifically at the film pictures > negative IAPS pictures contrast, the retrosplenial cortex and the precuneus were still significantly different.However, the PCC and ACC were not found in this contrast”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The emotional distractors in the Sternberg task are assumed to trigger only implicit memories of the film.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Implicit experimental trauma retrieval specifically involved the retrosplenial cortex and ACC, while both retrieval tasks produced trauma-related activity in the PCC and precuneus.

    “We show that implicit experimental trauma retrieval specifically involved the retrosplenial cortex and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), while both retrieval tasks resulted in trauma-related activity in the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and the precuneus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The emotional distractors in the Sternberg task are assumed to trigger only implicit memories of the film.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Sternberg task performance did not differ significantly between the two experimental groups or across picture types (all P>0.10).

    “Performances in the Sternberg task did not differ significantly, neither between the two experimental groups nor between pictures types (all P > 0.10).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The trauma film group gave higher negative and arousal ratings to film pictures than to neutral IAPS pictures (t(20)=6.6, P<0.001), whereas the control group did not.

    “In addition, participants from the experimental trauma group rated the film pictures as more negative and more arousing than neutral IAPS pictures (t 20 5 6.6, P < 0.001), while participants from the control group did not do that.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was a significant interaction between film type and picture type for valence (F(3,120)=7.80, P=0.003) and arousal (F(3,120)=5.44, P<0.001).

    “The pattern was substantiated by a significant interaction effect in the between-subject factor of film type (experimental trauma vs. neutral) and picture type (negative, neutral film and scrambled pictures; valence F 3,120 5 7.80, P 5 0.003 and arousal F 3,120 5 5.44, P < 0.001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Activity in the brain soon after experimental trauma predicted the later emergence of intrusions, with separate contributions from the retrosplenial cortex during implicit retrieval and the PCC during explicit retrieval.

    “Importantly, neural activity early after experimental trauma exposure predicted later intrusion development, with independent contributions from activity in the retrosplenial cortex (implicit retrieval) and the PCC (explicit retrieval).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The seven-day intrusion diary is assumed to validly measure intrusive memories.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    No increases in brain activity were found in the control group relative to the experimental trauma group in either the implicit or the explicit retrieval task.

    “No increases in brain activity were observed in the control group compared to the experimental trauma group, neither in the implicit nor the explicit retrieval task.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the implicit retrieval task, a bilateral amygdala seed showed greater connectivity with the supplementary motor area, precentral and paracentral lobule for film pictures compared with scrambled pictures, and this connectivity was stronger in control participants than in the experimental trauma group.

    “In the implicit retrieval task, PPI analyses with a bilateral amygdala seed revealed a higher connectivity with the supplementary motor area, precentral and paracentral lobule for film pictures > scrambled pictures (p FWE.cluster < 0.05, see Supporting Information Fig. 1), that was significantly stronger in the control group compared to the experimental trauma group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The trauma film group rated film pictures as more arousing and more negatively valenced than the neutral film group (t(40)=3.5, P=0.001).

    “As expected, participants who had seen the traumatic film (experimental trauma group) rated the film pictures as more arousing and negatively valenced as the neutral film group (t (40) 5 3.5 P 5 0.001), see Figure 1B”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Activation in the experimental trauma retrieval network predicted later intrusion development in a highly specific manner: retrosplenial cortex activation predicted intrusions when retrieval was implicit, while PCC activation independently predicted intrusive memories under explicit retrieval.

    “Finally, we show that activation in the experimental trauma retrieval network predicted later intrusion development in a highly specific manner: While activation in the retrosplenial cortex predicted intrusions when experimental trauma memory retrieval was implicit, activation in the PCC independently predicted intrusive memories under explicit retrieval conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was overlap between implicit and explicit memory, with the strongest overlap in the PCC.

    “However, there was also an overlap between implicit and explicit memory.The strongest overlap of both types of memory retrieval access was observed in the PCC.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Anxiety ratings, arousal ratings, and valence ratings did not contribute to the prediction model.

    “Further variables such as anxiety ratings, and arousal and valence ratings did not contribute to the model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Earlier PTSD research found altered neural activity during trauma-related stimuli and trauma memory across several brain regions, most notably the amygdala, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, ACC, and insula.

    “Previous research focusing on traumatic memory retrieval was mainly conducted in patients with full psychiatric manifestations of PTSD.It revealed altered neural correlates during the presentation of trauma-related stimuli and trauma memory in a variety of brain regions.Most prominent are brain activations in the amygdala, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and insular”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pitman et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Participants were randomly assigned to a trauma film group or a control film group.

    “Participants were randomly allocated to either a trauma film group or a control film group which was presented inside the MR scanner.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Traumatic memories are brought back involuntarily by internal or external cues and are experienced as highly intrusive and distressing.

    “Traumatic memories represent a major distress to patients as they are reactivated involuntarily after exposure to internal or external cues.They are rendered highly intrusive and disturbing [APA, 2013].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites APA, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The trauma-film paradigm has been validated in more than 70 studies in recent years.

    “The trauma-film paradigm was first developed over 50 years ago [Horowitz, 1969;Lazarus, 1964] and has been validated in over 70 studies only in the past years [James et al., 2016].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites James et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A prior fMRI study of encoding an experimental traumatic event found activity in the amygdala, striatum, thalamus, and ACC, and these regions predicted later experimental trauma intrusions.

    “Concerning the neural correlates in analogue studies, there has only been one functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study focusing on the encoding of an experimental traumatic event itself [Bourne et al., 2013].Neural correlates during encoding involved brain regions of the amygdala, striatum, thalamus and anterior cingulate cortex.These brain regions significantly predicted development of”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bourne et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    PTSD can be understood as a disorder of memory, with traumatic memories insufficiently integrated into the autobiographical memory network.

    “In sum, several theoretical accounts describe PTSD as a memory disorder [Brewin, 2014], mainly associated with a reduced integration of traumatic memories in the autobiographical memory network.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brewin, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Traumatic memories are a central symptom of PTSD and are involved in the disorder's onset and persistence.

    “Traumatic memories are a crucial symptom of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and play a major role in the development and maintenance of PTSD [APA, 2013;Elbert and Schauer, 2002;Michael et al., 2005].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites APA, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Elbert and Schauer, 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Michael et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The trauma-film paradigm reliably produces responses in healthy people that resemble real-life trauma, including core PTSD symptoms such as physiological arousal, intrusive memories, negative cognitions, and negative mood.

    “Responses comparable to real-life trauma have been systematically observed in healthy subjects after an experimental trauma (i.e., trauma film) [James et al., 2016].Responses include hallmark symptoms of PTSD [James et al., 2016].Specifically, physiological arousal, intrusive memories, negative cognitions and mood have been reported [APA, 2013;Butler et al., 1995;Holmes et al., 2004;James et al.,”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites James et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites APA, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Butler et al., 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A meta-analysis of PTSD trauma memory found greater activation in the retrosplenial cortex, precuneus, ACC, and amygdala.

    “A recent meta-analysis of trauma memory in PTSD revealed an increased activation in the retrosplenial cortex, precuneus, ACC and amygdala [Sartory et al., 2013].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sartory et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    People with PTSD tend to show stronger recall of trauma-related cues, altered autobiographical memory retrieval to cue words, and enhanced implicit memory in complex tasks.

    “PTSD patients typically exhibit an enhanced recall of trauma-related stimuli, an altered retrieval of autobiographical memories in response to cue words and also show an enhanced implicit memory in complex tasks.[McNally, 1997].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McNally, 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Three participants were excluded because of technical problems, leaving 42 healthy female participants in the analyzed sample.

    “Due to technical problems, three participants had to be discarded from the experiment (one participant fell asleep in the scanner and data of two participants could not be analyzed due to technical difficulties), leaving forty-two healthy participants in the sample (mean age 23.3, range 19-33 years).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In PTSD patients, implicit processing of trauma stimuli during a working memory task with trauma-related distractors was linked to greater activity in the fusiform gyrus, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and amygdala.

    “Moreover, patients who implicitly processed trauma stimuli exhibited an increased activation in the amygdala, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and fusiform gyrus [Morey et al., 2009] in a working memory task with traumarelated distractors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Morey et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In PTSD patients, explicit trauma focus during script-driven imagery was linked to greater activation in the thalamus, ACC, and medial frontal gyrus, and to stronger connectivity in the PCC, parietal lobe, and occipital lobe, especially on the right.

    “In contrast, patients who explicitly focused on a trauma during a script-driven imagery task exhibited increased brain activation in thalamus, ACC and medial frontal gyrus and enhanced connectivity in the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), parietal lobe and occipital lobe, specifically in the right hemisphere [Lanius et al., 2001[Lanius et al., , 2004]].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lanius et al., 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lanius et al., 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Statistical significance was defined as p FWE.cluster < 0.05 with a cluster-defining threshold of P = 0.001.

    “Statistical significance was set at p FWE.cluster < 0.05, with a cluster defining threshold (CDT) of P 5 0.001 [Eklund et al., 2016].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Eklund et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Before this study, the brain areas and processes involved in early retrieval of traumatic memories and their link to intrusion development had not been identified.

    “In contrast, brain areas and processes involved in early retrieval attempts of traumatic memories and their relation to traumatic intrusion development as a predictor variable have not yet been identified.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Symptoms after an experimental trauma last only hours or days and decline within one week.

    “However, in contrast to PTSD, symptoms after an experimental trauma only last for hours or days and finally decrease within one week [Holmes et al., 2004;James et al., 2016].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Holmes et al., 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites James et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Witnessing trauma can cause behavioral impairments in rats and can lead to PTSD in humans.

    “Witnessing trauma can result in behavioral impairments in both rats [Patki et al., 2014] and humans [Al-Nuaimi et al., 2015;Atwoli et al., 2015].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Patki et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Al-Nuaimi et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Atwoli et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Freezing or fainting during trauma exposure and reliving can be observed in PTSD patients, as suggested by dissociation theories.

    “The displayed phenomenon can be observed in PTSD patients, where freezing or fainting occurs during trauma exposure and reliving, as suggested by dissociations theories in PTSD [Schauer and Elbert, 2010].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schauer and Elbert, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    A possible intervention targeting memory integration may be found by enhancing memory consolidation and integration during sleep.

    “A possible intervention that targets memory integration can be potentially found by enhancing memory consolidation and integration during sleep [Kleim et al., 2016;Stickgold, 2002].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kleim et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Stickgold, 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Retrosplenial cortex and precuneus appeared specific to experimental trauma material, whereas ACC and PCC were more associated with overall heightened responses to negative stimuli during the implicit memory task.

    “Interestingly, the retrosplenial cortex and precuneus seem to be specific for the experimental trauma material, whereas the ACC and PCC were rather associated with overall heightened responses to negative stimuli during the implicit memory task.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    With identification of the relevance of PCC and retrosplenial cortex, preventive and targeted treatment can be developed.

    “With the identification of the relevance of PCC and retrosplenial cortex, preventive and targeted treatment can be developed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The ACC has been associated with detection of unfavorable outcomes, response errors, response conflict, and decision uncertainty.

    “Interestingly, the ACC has been associated with detection of unfavorable outcomes, response errors, response conflict and decision uncertainty [Ridderinkhof et al., 2004]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ridderinkhof et al., 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The PCC has been reported to be involved in processing emotional salience.

    “Furthermore, the PCC has been reported to be implicated in the processing of emotional salience [Maddock et al., 2003].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Maddock et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Both PCC and retrosplenial cortex have been proposed as mediators of the interaction between emotions and memory.

    “Both the PCC and the retrosplenial cortex have been proposed as mediators for the interaction between emotions and memory [Maddock, 1999;Maddock et al., 2003].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Maddock, 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Maddock et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Both implicit and explicit experimental trauma memory retrieval activities significantly predicted later intrusion development, but they explained distinct aspects of the variance.

    “Thus, both brain activities during implicit and explicit experimental trauma memory retrieval significantly predict later intrusion development, but they explain distinct aspects of the variance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This absence of amygdala activation applied to both implicit and explicit retrieval and might indicate stronger emotional reactivation during exposure to traumatic cues in patients compared with healthy females.

    “This accounts for both implicit and explicit retrieval, which might point to a stronger emotional reactivation during exposure to traumatic cues in patients compared to healthy females.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The decrease in amygdala-SMA connectivity was observed only in the control > experimental trauma contrast and therefore cannot be uniquely ascribed to the effects of the trauma film.

    “Moreover, the decrease in connectivity has only been observed in the control > experimental trauma contrast and therefore cannot be uniquely ascribed to the effects of the trauma film.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    When fight or flight is impossible, reduced supplementary motor area activity can be seen as a consequence of that inability.

    “In case of an inability to either fight or flee, less activity in the supplementary motor area can be seen as a consequence of this inability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The supplementary motor area has been associated with readiness for action in previous literature.

    “The supplementary motor area has been associated with readiness for action in previous literature [Cunnington et al., 2005].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cunnington et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    All identified brain regions have previously been implicated in retrieval of trauma memories in PTSD patients; a meta-analysis reported activation in retrosplenial cortex, precuneus, and ACC.

    “Importantly, all of the identified brain regions have been previously implicated also in retrieval of trauma memories in patients suffering from PTSD: A recent meta-analysis of trauma memory in PTSD patients with full psychiatric manifestation reported also activation in the retrosplenial cortex, precuneus, and ACC [Sartory et al., 2013].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sartory et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    A possible change in activity in these brain regions might be highly relevant for early intervention strategies.

    “a possible change in activity in these brain regions might be highly relevant for early intervention strategies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The experimental trauma memory retrieval network depended on retrieval type: implicit and automatic retrieval activated retrosplenial cortex, precuneus, ACC, and PCC, while explicit and intentional retrieval activated PCC and precuneus.

    “In addition, this experimental trauma memory retrieval network also depended on the type of retrieval access: while implicit and automatic retrieval activated the retrosplenial cortex, precuneus and the ACC as well as PCC, explicit and intentional retrieval activated the PCC and the precuneus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Increased participation of brain regions involved in long-term memory storage might avoid or reduce overconsolidation and decontextualisation, which might underlie intrusive and uncontrollable traumatic memories.

    “Increased participation of the brain regions involved in long-term memory storage might thereby avoid or at least reduce the chance of distinct”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study was not able to address whether pre-existing neural differences affect processing, which limits relevance of findings.

    “As we were not able to address this topic in our study, this further limits the relevance of our findings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The retrosplenial cortex and PCC have been strongly implicated in self-referential processing and episodic memory encoding and retrieval, particularly autobiographical memories.

    “Particularly the retrosplenial cortex and the PCC have been strongly implicated in selfreferential processing as well as in episodic memory encoding and retrieval, more precisely with respect to autobiographical memories [Foster et al., 2013;Maddock et al., 2001].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Foster et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Maddock et al., 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This network was specific to experimental trauma memory retrieval because activation depended on having a memory representation of the traumatic film: it occurred only in participants who saw and witnessed traumatic scenes, not in controls who saw neutral scenes from the same film and did not witness a traumatic event.

    “This network was specific for retrieval of experimental trauma memories, as the activation in this network critically depended on the existence of memory representation of the traumatic film: The activation only occurred in participants that saw and witnessed traumatic scenes compared to a control group that was presented with neutral scenes from the same film and thus”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
      “did not witness a traumatic event.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
48 of 48
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The traumatic film, which shows a rape scene, is assumed to resemble witnessing a traumatic event.

    “In our study, healthy participants watched a traumatic film consisting of a rape scene, which resembles witnessing a traumatic event.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The seven-day intrusion diary is assumed to validly measure intrusive memories.

    “The intrusion diary consisted of a seven-day diary which had to be filled in at home.Participants were educated about intrusive memories and asked to write down every intrusive memory that came to their mind.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The emotional distractors in the Sternberg task are assumed to trigger only implicit memories of the film.

    “Throughout all trials, participants were explicitly asked to focus on the Sternberg task and not on the distractors, so that the emotional distractors solely trigger implicit memories of the film watched before.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The neutral film is assumed to be an appropriate control for the trauma film.

    “In the neutral film, a collection of neutral scenes with the same characters was displayed.Both films had the same duration.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The film pictures are assumed to be emotionally neutral and to act as reminder cues for the film.

    “Notably, our film pictures consisted of emotionally neutral pictures taken from both films equally to prevent familiarity effects (trauma and neutral films).They included no action but rather served as a (initially neutral) reminder cue (e.g., tunnel where the protagonist was raped).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 100-minute delay after the film is assumed to represent an early period after trauma exposure.

    “100 min after the film, participants performed first an implicit and then an explicit memory task.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No prior study has directly used exactly the same visual stimuli in a retrieval task as during the experimental trauma itself.

    “So far there has been no study directly using exactly the same visual stimuli in a retrieval task as during the experimental trauma itself.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The experimental trauma film paradigm includes features of witnessing a trauma.

    “Moreover, the experimental trauma rather includes features of witnessing a trauma.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The PCC is of high importance in successful memory retrieval.

    “The PCC is hypothesized to be of high importance in successful memory retrieval.”
9 of 9

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Proposed reduction in neural activity runs opposite to the reported prediction

    Minor

    The paper proposes diminishing the trauma-specific neural correlates to reduce later symptoms, but reports that higher activity in the predictive regions was associated with fewer intrusions. The proposed direction of change conflicts with that finding.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gvozdanovic, G. A., Stämpfli, P., Seifritz, E., & Rasch, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Fribourg (CH)
Corresponding author
Rasch, Björn
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-04-17
Volume
38
Issue
7
Pages
3592-3602
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2611324757
Cited by
23
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • RERO DOC (Universität Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
University of Zurich: Clinical Research Priority Programs ‘Sleep and Health’ and 'Molecular Imaging', Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF 100014_162388.)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, intrusion, flashbacks, neural correlates, retrosplenial cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, amygdala, supplementary motor area

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review