Cited by 12Mental Health Treatment and AccessMedical Coding and Health InformationSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence and Frequency of Mental Health Care Provided by General Practitioners: Differences between 2 National Data Sources for the Same Population

Open access
Palin, JoAnne L, Goldner, Elliot M, Koehoorn, Mieke, Hertzman, Clyde·2012·The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Estimates from Canada's first national mental health surveillance initiative- which is based on diagnostic codes in administrative health care utilization databases- indicate that the proportion of Canadians who receive mental health care is more than twice as high as reported in Canada's national mental health survey. Our study examines and clarifies the nature and extent of differences between 2 predominant types of data that are used for mental health services research and planning. Method: A person-by-person data linkage was conducted between the Canadian Community Health Survey: Mental Health and Well-Being and administrative health care utilization records (British Columbia Ministry of Health Services-Medical Services Plan, and Hospital Discharge Abstract Database) within a universal-access, publically funded health care system, to examine the level of agreement between the data sources and respondent characteristics associated with agreement ( N = 2378). Results: The prevalence of mental health care from general practitioners (GPs) was higher in administrative data (19.3%; 95% CI 17.7% to 20.9%) than survey data (8.5%; 95% CI 7.5% to 9.8%). Agreement between prevalence estimates from the 2 data sources was associated with age, mental health characteristics, and the number of GP visits. The median number of visits per person was significantly higher in the survey data. Conclusions: GPs saw more than twice as many patients for mental health issues according to administrative data, compared with survey data; however, the number of visits per patient was higher in survey data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/070674371205700606

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Watson DE, 2005, Can J Psychiatry, 50, 398
  2. Statistics Canada, 2004, data dictionary (public use microdata file)
  3. British Columbia Ministry of Health Services, Medical Services Plan of BC [Internet]
  4. 2005, The status of alternative payment programs for physicians in Canada: 2002–2003 and preliminary information for 2003–2004
  5. British Columbia Ministry of Health Services, 2011, Medical Services Plan of BC: Additional diagnostic codes [Internet]
  6. Mustard CA, 2000, Validity of self-reported utilization of insured health care services
  7. Lin E., 2006, Paper presented at the Annual Scientific Symposium of the Canadian Academy of Psychiatric Epidemiologists
  8. Palin JL, 2011, Health Rep, 22, 41

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Palin, J. L., Goldner, E. M., Koehoorn, M., & Hertzman, C.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Palin, JoAnne L
Venue
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2012-06
Volume
57
Issue
6
Pages
366-374
ISSN
  • 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1497-0015
OpenAlex
W198690303
Cited by
12
References
23
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Health Services Research Foundation
  • Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Michael Smith Health Research BC
  • Public Health Agency
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
  • Ministry of Health, British Columbia
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (65804_1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
mental health service utilization, general practitioners, data source agreement, administrative health data, National Mental Health Survey, Canadian Community Health Survey, hospital discharge abstracts, mental health surveillance, prevalence estimates, British Columbia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, British Columbia, Community Mental Health Services, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data Collection, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Health Services Research, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Utilization Review, Reproducibility of Results, Universal Health Insurance, Young Adult, General Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review