Cited by 7Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Economic analysis of the tailored activity program: a nonpharmacological approach to improve quality of life in people living with dementia and their caregivers

Open access
Pizzi, Laura T., Prioli, Katherine M., Jutkowitz, Eric, Piersol, Catherine V., Lyketsos, Constantine G., Abersone, Ilze, Marx, Katherine A., Gitlin, Laura N.·2023·Journal of Applied Gerontology

Abstract

We investigated costs of delivering the Tailored Activity Program (TAP) and cost savings from two perspectives (health sector and societal) for people living with dementia (PLWD) and their caregivers (dyads) compared to attention control (AC) using data from a randomized controlled trial. The evaluation assessed intervention delivery costs and caregiver reported health care utilization. The total intervention cost of TAP was $1707/dyad versus $864/dyad for AC, and total costs over 6 months for TAP dyads as compared to AC were $1299 (CI: -$10,496, $7898) less from the healthcare perspective, and $761 (CI: -$10,133, $8611) less from the societal perspective. TAP cost savings are driven by lower use of healthcare services among participating dyads, but further analyses with larger samples is warranted to confirm its financial impact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/07334648231158091

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TAP interventions may also be cost saving because of lower use of healthcare systems.

    “They may also be cost saving because of lower use of healthcare systems. (523)”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission (2024) · cites this paper as [523]

    The Results (Healthcare Sector Perspective Analysis; page not provided) report lower net healthcare costs for TAP than for the attention-control group, supporting the possibility of cost savings. But the Discussion says costly medications used by two control-group participants drove the savings and that caregiver healthcare service use may have been affected by TAP; it does not establish lower healthcare use as the reason for the savings. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Buck CJ (2017). 2017 HCPCS level II professional edition-e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
  2. Gertler PJ, Martinez S, Premand P, Rawlings LB, & Vermeersch CM (2016). Impact evaluation in practice (pp. 129– 142). The World Bank.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pizzi, L. T., Prioli, K. M., Jutkowitz, E., Piersol, C. V., Lyketsos, C. G., Abersone, I., Marx, K. A., & Gitlin, L. N.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Providence VA Medical Center (US)
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Pizzi, Laura T.
Venue
Journal of Applied Gerontology
Published
2023-02-22
Volume
42
Issue
7
Pages
1433-1444
ISSN
  • 0733-4648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4523
OpenAlex
W4321600444
Cited by
7
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins Alzheimer's disease research Center (P30 AG066507)
  • National Institute of Aging (1R21 AG059623, R01 AG041781)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
dementia, caregivers, non-pharmacological treatment, cost analysis, cost reduction, quality of life, health care utilization, dyads, attentional control
MeSH terms
Dementia, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Quality of Life, Caregivers, Health Care Costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review