Cited by 123Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeOccupational Therapy Practice and Research

The Cost-Effectiveness of a Nonpharmacologic Intervention for Individuals With Dementia and Family Caregivers: The Tailored Activity Program

Open access
Gitlin, Laura N., Hodgson, Nancy, Jutkowitz, Eric, Pizzi, Laura·2010·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate cost-effectiveness of the Tailored Activity Program (TAP) for individuals with dementia and family caregivers.Design Cost-effectiveness study of a two-group randomized controlled trial involving 60 patients-caregiver dyads randomized to intervention or wait-list control.Setting Participants' homes in Philadelphia region.Participants Caregivers were aged ≥ 21 years, lived with patients, and provided ≥ 4 hours of daily care. Patients had moderate dementia and behavioral symptoms Intervention Eight sessions of occupational therapy over 4 months to identify patients' preserved capabilities, previous roles, habits and interests, develop customized activities, and train families in their use.Measurements Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) expressed as the cost to bring about one additional unit of benefit measured by caregiver hours per day "doing things" and hours per day "being on duty." Decision tree and Monte Carlo analyses tested robustness of the economic models.Results Total average intervention cost was $941.63 per day. Intervention caregivers saved one extra hour per day "doing things" at a cost of $2.37/day and one extra hour per day "being on duty" at a cost of $1.10/day. Monte Carlo showed that TAP was cost-effective 79.2% of the time for "doing things" and 79.6% of the time for "being on duty." Varying the cost assumptions did not change cost-effectiveness.Conclusions Findings suggest that investment in TAP is cost-effective and afforded families an important, limited and highly valued resource, needed time off from caregiving. This nonpharmacologic approach should be considered part of the clinical management of dementia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jgp.0b013e3181c37d13

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gitlin et al. and O'Connor et al. described a home-based occupational therapy program based on personal capabilities and individual preferences that promoted a significantly greater reduction in agitation.

    “Gitlin et al. [48] and O'Connor et al. [11] described a home-based occupational therapy program based on personal capabilities and individual preferences. This tailored program promoted a significantly greater reduction in agitation.”

    From Nonpharmacological Interventions to Reduce Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia: A Systematic Review (2015) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Methods (Tailored Activity Program; page not provided) describe a largely home-based occupational therapy intervention tailored to patients’ capabilities, previous roles, habits, and interests. The Objective reports significantly fewer behavioral occurrences overall than in the wait-list control group, particularly shadowing and repetitive questioning, but does not report a significantly greater reduction in agitation specifically. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a randomized controlled trial, Gitlin et al. found that nonpharmacological interventions based on Tailored Activities Program are cost-effective and should be considered as part of the clinical management of dementia.

    “In a randomized controlled trial, Gitlin et al. [48] found that nonpharmacological interventions based on Tailored Activities Program are cost-effective and should be considered as part of the clinical management of dementia.”
  • Occupational therapy seems effective in reducing behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, increasing patient's participation, improving physical performance and quality of life, and reducing negative communication.

    “OT seems also effective in reducing BPSD, increasing patient's participation, improving physical performance, and QoL and reducing negative communication (123–129).”
  • The Tailored Activity Program was effective in reducing caregiver burden and was highly cost-effective.

    “Besides being effective in reducing caregiver burden, in that caregiver had significantly more free time, TAP was demonstrated to be highly cost-effective (123).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [5]Alexopoulos GS Jeste DV Chung H Treatment of dementia and its behavioral disturbances [Special Report] Post Graduate Medicine 2005 17203561
  2. [13]Cohen-Mansfield J Nonpharmacological interventions for inappropriate behaviors in dementia Alzheimer’s Care Quarterly 2005 6 2 129 145
  3. [21]American Psychiatric Association Work Group on Alzheimer’s Disease and other Dementias American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for the treatment of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Second edition Am J Psychiatry 2007 164 12 Suppl 5 56 18340692

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gitlin, L. N., Hodgson, N., Jutkowitz, E., & Pizzi, L.
Affiliations
Thomas Jefferson University (US)
Corresponding author
Gitlin, Laura N.
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
510-519
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038210589
Cited by
123
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH069425)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Keywords
dementia, family caregivers, occupational therapy, non-pharmacological treatment, cost-effectiveness, caregiver burden, behavioral symptoms of dementia, caregiver hours, home-based intervention, decision tree analysis, Monte Carlo simulation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Monte Carlo Method, Occupational Therapy, Caregivers, Health Care Costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review