Cited by 306Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and ManagementHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

The Importance of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Shaping Turnover Intent: A Test of a Causal Model

Lambert, Eric, Hogan, Nancy·2009·Criminal Justice Review

Abstract

Employee turnover can have devastating effects on correctional facilities. Excessive turnover wastes recruiting and training dollars. In addition, high turnover rates may also directly affect the security of the institution as well as the safety of both staff and inmates. Thus this study surveyed correctional staff at a maximum security private prison to examine the impact of the work environment, personal characteristics, external employment opportunities, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment on turnover intent. The results of the multivariate ordinary least squares regression equations generally supported the proposed path model, and indicated age, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment directly influence turnover intent, whereas gender, job satisfaction, role conflict, role ambiguity, role overload, input into decision making, and organizational fairness indirectly affected employees' decisions to leave the job.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0734016808324230

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Correctional work involves a hierarchical, rank-informed relationship between different staff and administration, and that organizational structure arguably facilitates stress, job dissatisfaction, and burnout.

    “For example, correctional work involves a hierarchical, rank-informed, relationship between different staff and the administration, and that organizational structure arguably facilitates stress, job dissatisfaction, and even burnout [23,24,25,26].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lambert, E., & Hogan, N.
Affiliations
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Ferris State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lambert, Eric
Venue
Criminal Justice Review
Published
2008-09-10
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
96-118
ISSN
  • 0734-0168 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3839
OpenAlex
W2088249043
Cited by
306
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 25
FWCI
18.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Criminal Justice Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
turnover intention, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, prison staff, private prisons, maximum security prisons, role conflict, role ambiguity, role overload, organizational justice, work environment, employee retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review