Cited by 2,565Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and ManagementPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

An index of job satisfaction.

Brayfield, Arthur H., Rothe, Harold F.·1951·Journal of Applied Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0055617

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The updated five-item version of Brayfield and Rothe's (1951) Index of Job Satisfaction has been found reliable in past literature and is widely used in job satisfaction research.

    “This shortened version has been found to be reliable in past literature and it is widely used in job satisfaction research (e.g., Judge et al., 2000).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F.
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
1951-10
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
307-311
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W2019299603
Cited by
2,565
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 106 · 2025: 137 · 2024: 119 · 2023: 133 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 117 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 118 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 108 · 2015: 115 · 2014: 111 · 2013: 100 · 2012: 94
FWCI
8.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
job satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review