Cited by 65Municipal Solid Waste ManagementWaste Management and RecyclingEnvironmental Education and Sustainability

Delivery and impact of household waste prevention intervention campaigns (at the local level)

Sharp, Veronica, Giorgi, Sara, Wilson, David C.·2010·Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy

Abstract

This paper presents one strand of the findings from a comprehensive synthesis review of policy-relevant evidence on household waste prevention. Understanding what is achievable in terms of local household waste prevention intervention campaigns enables policy makers, local authorities and practitioners to identify optimum approaches to deliver effective behaviour change. The results of the evidence have been assembled and are discussed in two contexts: (1) the delivery of intervention campaigns as a package of measures used to 'enable', 'engage' and 'encourage' householders to change their behaviour; and (2) the impact of local household waste prevention intervention campaigns in terms of tonnage data. Waste prevention measures adopted include home composting, reducing food waste, smart shopping, donating items for reuse, small changes in the home, reducing junk mail and using cloth/reusable nappies. In terms of diverting biodegradable municipal waste from landfill, the biggest impacts can be attributed to food waste prevention (1.5 kg household(- 1) week(-1)) and home composting (2.9 kg household( -1) week(-1)). Projects providing a package of other waste prevention interventions have shown a very wide range of impacts: a broad indication is that such a package could achieve around 0.5 to 1 kg household(-1) week(- 1) reduction at source. Disaggregating which waste prevention measures influenced uptake is generally not possible, but the evidence suggests that this does not matter: behaviour change has been supported by integrating a range of intervention tools and campaign promotions which have made a collective rather than isolated difference: it is a collection and an accumulation of measures that will have impact.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0734242x10361507

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A review of UK household general waste intervention campaigns found a cumulative effect from a range of strategies was more effective than an isolated campaign, and self-weighing was an important motivator.

    “On the other hand, a review of household general waste intervention campaigns in the UK found that a cumulative effect from a range of intervention strategies was more effective than an isolated campaign in reducing food and other types of waste, and that self-weighing was an important motivator in this effort as it provided a cue for participants to acknowledge and disrupt an existing habit (Shar”

    From Waste watchers: A food waste reduction intervention among households in Arizona (2021) · cites this paper as Sharp et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharp, V., Giorgi, S., & Wilson, D. C.
Affiliations
  • The Social Marketing Practice, Didcot, UK,
  • Brook Lyndhurst (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Sharp, Veronica
Venue
Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
Published
2010-03
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
256-268
ISSN
  • 0734-242X (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-3669
OpenAlex
W2122228585
Cited by
65
References
8
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Waste Management & Research The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
Keywords
behavior change, home composting, food waste reduction, smart shopping, biodegradable municipal waste, landfill diversion, local government
MeSH terms
Behavior, Conservation of Natural Resources, Family Characteristics, United Kingdom, Humans, Waste Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review