Cited by 107Transportation and Mobility InnovationsUrban Transport and AccessibilityTransportation Planning and Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Residential Location Choice in the Era of Shared Autonomous Vehicles

Zhang, Wenwen, Guhathakurta, Subhrajit·2021·Journal of Planning Education and Research

Abstract

This study examines the potential changes in residential location choice in a scenario where shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs) are a popular mode of travel in the Atlanta metropolitan area. This hypothetical study is based on an agent-based simulation approach, which integrates residential location choice models with a SAV simulation model. The coupled model simulates future home location choices given current home location preferences and real estate development patterns. The results indicate that commuters may relocate to neighborhoods with better public schools and more amenities due to reductions in commute costs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0739456x18776062

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. AAA. 2010. “Your Driving Cost: How Much Are You Really Paying to Drive? (2010 Edition).” http://exchange.aaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/201048935480.Driving-Costs-2010.pdf.
  2. AAA. 2016. “Your Driving Cost: How Much Are You Really Paying to Drive? (2016 Edition).” http://exchange.aaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2016-YDC-Brochure.pdf.
  3. Albright J., 2016, Marketplace of Change: Automobile Insurance in the Era of Autonomous Vehicles
  4. Barclays, 2016, Disruptive Mobility: A Scenario for 2040
  5. Bridges R., 2015, Driverless Car Revolution: Buy Mobility, Not Metal
  6. Burns L. D., 2013, Transforming Personal Mobility
  7. Croissant Y., 2010, Mlogit: Multinomial Logit Model. R package version 0.1-5
  8. Habib K. N., 2008, Paper presented at the 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board
  9. Krueger R., 2016, Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting
  10. Litman T., 2014, Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions
  11. NuTonomy. 2016. “nuTonomy and Grab Launch Partnership to Expand Public Trial of On-Demand Self-Driving Car Service in Singapore, 2016.” https://www.grab.com/sg/press/tech-product/nutonomy-grab-launch-partnership-expand-public-trial-demand-self-driving-car-service-singapore/
  12. Shen Y., 2017, Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting
  13. Thünen J. H. von, 1826, Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung Auf Nationalökonomie Und Landwirtschaft
  14. Zhang W., 2015, Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 107

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, W., & Guhathakurta, S.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Guhathakurta, Subhrajit
Venue
Journal of Planning Education and Research
Published
2018-05-28
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
135-148
ISSN
  • 0739-456X (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6577
OpenAlex
W2806301036
Cited by
107
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Planning Education and Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1441208)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
Keywords
shared autonomous vehicles, residential location choice, real estate development, public schools, neighborhood amenities, agent-based modeling, Atlanta metropolitan area

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review