Cited by 419Transportation and Mobility InnovationsVehicle emissions and performanceElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure

Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of US light-duty vehicles

Greenblatt, Jeffery B., Saxena, Samveg·2015·Nature Climate Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nclimate2685

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greenblatt, J. B., & Saxena, S.
Affiliations
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Greenblatt, Jeffery B.
Venue
Nature Climate Change
Published
2015-07-06
Volume
5
Issue
9
Pages
860-863
ISSN
  • 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-6798
OpenAlex
W2215284045
Cited by
419
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 6
FWCI
29.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle emissions and performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Keywords
autonomous taxis, autonomous vehicles, greenhouse gas emissions, light-duty vehicles, vehicle miles traveled, battery electric vehicles, oil consumption, shared mobility, vehicle size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review