The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perspectives on Authenticity in Teaching
Abstract
The authors work with 22 educators from a variety of disciplines during a 3-year time span to understand what authentic teaching means and to explore how authenticity is manifested in practice. Using a grounded theory approach, the authors interview participants twice per year, observe their classes, and hold focus groups at the end of the project. Data interpretation reveals five dimensions of authenticity: self-awareness, awareness of others, relationships with learners, awareness of context, and a critically reflective approach to practice. Following grounded theory guidelines, the authors develop a model that incorporates the categories generated from the data and generate tentative hypotheses about practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Hepburn, R. W., Heidegger, M., Macquarrie, J., & Robinson, E. (1927) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 12,201
(2014) · The Reflective Practitioner in Professional Education · doi:10.1057/9781137399595.0007 · Cited by 8,325
Becoming a critically reflective teacher
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-5232 · Cited by 3,754
Qualitative research: analysis types and software tools
Tesch, R. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,239
Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress
(2001) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/s0099-1333(01)00248-8 · Cited by 2,285
Learning as transformation: critical perspectives on a theory in progress
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-1707 · Cited by 2,078
Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools
Beaudry, J. S. (1991) · Evaluation Practice · doi:10.1016/0886-1633(91)90027-u · Cited by 1,931
Buber, M. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203220092 · Cited by 1,203
Knapton, H., & Gurjee, J. (2019) · Teaching Business, Economics and Enterprise 14–19 · doi:10.4324/9781315171944-9 · Cited by 1,097
Cited by
An update of transformative learning theory: a critical review of the empirical research (1999–2005)
Taylor, E. W. (2007) · International Journal of Lifelong Education · doi:10.1080/02601370701219475 · Cited by 1,020
Metadata
- Authors
- Cranton, P., & Carusetta, E.
- Venue
- Adult Education Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-22
- ISSN
- 0741-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3047
- OpenAlex
- W1989455908
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 36.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perspectives on Authenticity in Teaching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0741713604268894
- The paper
- Cranton, P., & Carusetta, E. (2004). Perspectives on Authenticity in Teaching. Adult Education Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713604268894
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
