Cited by 266Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportCareer Development and Diversity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“It's Not What I Expected”: A Qualitative Study of Youth Mentoring Relationship Failures

Spencer, Renée·2007·Journal of Adolescent Research

Abstract

Although estimates are that only about half of youth mentoring relationships established through formal programs last beyond a few months, almost no attention has been paid to understanding mentoring relationship failures. In-depth semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 adult and 11 adolescent male and female participants in a community-based one-to-one mentoring program whose relationships ended early. Line-by-line coding and a narrative approach to a thematic analysis of the interview transcripts yielded six salient factors that contributed to the demise of these mentoring relationships: (a) mentor or protégé abandonment, (b) perceived lack of protégé motivation, (c) unfulfilled expectations, (d) deficiencies in mentor relational skills, including the inability to bridge cultural divides, (e) family interference, and (f) inadequate agency support.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0743558407301915

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 34 references

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Barrett, B., 2004, Little moments big magic: Inspirational stories of Big Brothers and Big Sisters and the magic they create
  2. Flaxman, E., 1988, Youth mentoring: Programs and practices
  3. Freedman, M., 1993, The kindness of strangers: Adult mentors, urban youth, and the new volunteerism
  4. Johnson, J.M. (2002). In-depth interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 103–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications .
  5. MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnership, 2003, Elements of effective practice
  6. MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnership, 2006, Mentoring in America 2005: A snapshot of the current state of mentoring
  7. Seidman, I.E., 1991, Interviewing as qualitative research
  8. Spencer, R., 2006, The Community Psychologist, 39, 35

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–266 of 266

Metadata

Authors
Spencer, R.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Spencer, Renée
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Research
Published
2007-07
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
331-354
ISSN
  • 0743-5584 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6895
OpenAlex
W2022414674
Cited by
266
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 21
FWCI
7.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Adolescent Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
youth mentoring, breakup, abandonment, unfulfilled expectations, cultural differences, family interference, agency support, community mentoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review