Cited by 48Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportCounseling Practices and Supervision

It Takes a Village to Break Up a Match: A Systemic Analysis of Formal Youth Mentoring Relationship Endings

Spencer, Renée, Gowdy, Grace, Drew, Alison L., McCormack, Martha J., Keller, Thomas E.·2020·Child & Youth Care Forum

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10566-019-09520-w

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Qualitative studies in the U.S. and Australia identified several reasons for early termination, including unforeseen changes in life circumstances, mentees' dissatisfaction, disappointment or disinterest, mentor dissatisfaction, unrealistic expectations, mentors' lack of relational skills, parents' interference and lack of parental support, gradual dissolution, and abandonment.

    “Their reported reasons for early termination included genuinely unforeseen changes in the mentors’ and mentees’ life circumstances, mentees’ dissatisfaction, disappointment or disinterest, mentor dissatisfaction, unrealistic expectations on the part of the mentors or the mentees, the mentors’ lack of relational skills, parents’ interference and lack of parental support, gradual dissolution with”
  • Weaker relationships were more likely to end as a result of mentors' or mentees' dissatisfaction with the relationship, or to dissolve without formal termination.

    “Weaker relationships were more likely to end as a result of mentors’ or mentees’ dissatisfaction with the relationship, or to dissolve without formal termination [116,118,119,120,121].”
  • The perceived similarity between BBBS mentors' ideal versus actual roles were significant predictors of mentors' expressed intentions to preserve the relationship, whereas mentors' feelings of frustration and ineffectiveness compared with their initial expectations were shown to account for early termination.

    “The perceived similarity between BBBS mentors’ ideal versus actual roles were significant predictors of mentors’ expressed intentions to preserve the relationship [144], whereas mentors’ feelings of frustration and ineffectiveness compared with their initial expectations were shown to account for early termination, as reported in qualitative studies [116,117,120].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spencer, R., Gowdy, G., Drew, A. L., McCormack, M. J., & Keller, T. E.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Portland State University (US)
Corresponding author
Spencer, Renée
Venue
Child & Youth Care Forum
Published
2019-08-29
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
97-120
ISSN
  • 1053-1890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3319
OpenAlex
W2971193882
Cited by
48
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child & Youth Care Forum (publishedVersion)
  • OpenBU (Boston University) (acceptedVersion)
  • PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2012-MU-FX-0001)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
youth mentoring, community mentoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review