Cited by 12Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesSchool Health and Nursing EducationHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Managing Chronic Pain in the Classroom: Development and Usability Testing of an eHealth Educational Intervention for Educators

King, Sara, Boutilier, Jessica A., MacLaren Chorney, Jill·2018·Canadian Journal of School Psychology

Abstract

Although chronic pain is relatively common in childhood, many teachers feel ill-prepared to work with students with chronic and recurrent pain in the classroom and would like to learn more about supporting these students. A web-based eHealth intervention designed to provide information about pain and pain management in the classroom was developed based on input from clinicians, and usability was tested using three groups of stakeholders (i.e., youth with chronic pain, parents of youth with chronic pain, and teachers). Preliminary testing indicated that the usability goals were met, with the majority of participants in all groups indicating that the website was easy to use and that they would either recommend it to teachers or use it themselves. Minor design and content changes were suggested and made, whereas major changes will be made in the future. Results provide encouraging preliminary support for the utility of eHealth interventions as knowledge translation and dissemination tools for educators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0829573516674308

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple authors in the included studies indicated that usability tests should be conducted with a broad range of stakeholders, not only end users such as patients, but also caregivers, managers, technology developers, and experts on content and design.

    “First, multiple authors indicated that usability tests should be conducted with a broad range of stakeholders: not only end users such as patients, but also caregivers, managers, technology developers, and experts on content and design”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, S., Boutilier, J. A., & MacLaren Chorney, J.
Affiliations
  • Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • Mount Saint Vincent University (CA)
  • Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Venue
Canadian Journal of School Psychology
Published
2016-10-23
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
95-109
ISSN
  • 0829-5735 (ISSN-L)
  • 2154-3984
OpenAlex
W2533821176
Cited by
11
References
45
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of School Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation
  • Scotia Scholars Award
  • Pain in Child Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
chronic pain, pediatric pain, teachers, digital health interventions, web-based educational intervention, usability testing, knowledge translation, knowledge dissemination, stakeholder feedback

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review