Cited by 54Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

eHealth Program to Empower Patients in Returning to Normal Activities and Work After Gynecological Surgery: Intervention Mapping as a Useful Method for Development

Open access
Vonk Noordegraaf, Antonie, Huirne, Judith A.F, Pittens, Carina A, van Mechelen, Willem, Broerse, Jacqueline E.W, Brölmann, Hans A.M, Anema, Johannes R·2012·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Full recovery after gynecological surgery takes much longer than expected regardless of surgical technique or the level of invasiveness. After discharge, detailed convalescence recommendations are not provided to patients typically, and postoperative care is fragmented, poorly coordinated, and given only on demand. For patients, this contributes to irrational beliefs and avoidance of resumption of activities and can result in a prolonged sick leave. OBJECTIVE: To develop an eHealth intervention that empowers gynecological patients during the perioperative period to obtain timely return to work (RTW) and prevent work disability. METHODS: The intervention mapping (IM) protocol was used to develop the eHealth intervention. A literature search about behavioral and environmental conditions of prolonged sick leave and delayed RTW in patients was performed. Patients' needs, attitudes, and beliefs regarding postoperative recovery and resumption of work were identified through focus group discussions. Additionally, a literature search was performed to obtain determinants, methods, and strategies for the development of a suitable interactive eHealth intervention to empower patients to return to normal activities after gynecological surgery, including work. Finally, the eHealth intervention was evaluated by focus group participants, medical doctors, and eHealth specialists through questionnaires. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients participated in the focus group discussions. Sufficient, uniform, and tailored information regarding surgical procedures, complications, and resumption of activities and work were considered most essential. Knowing who to contact in case of mental or physical complaints, and counseling and tools for work reintegration were also considered important. Finally, opportunities to exchange experiences with other patients were a major issue. Considering the determinants of the Attitude-Social influence-self-Efficacy (ASE) model, various strategies based on a combination of theory and evidence were used, resulting in an eHealth intervention with different interactive functionalities including tailored convalescence recommendations and a video to communicate the most common pitfalls during the perioperative period to patients and employers. Fifteen patients in the focus groups, 11 physicians, and 3 eHealth specialists suggested points for improvement to optimize the usability of the eHealth intervention and judged it an approachable, appropriate, and attractive eHealth intervention to empower gynecological patients. CONCLUSIONS: The IM protocol was a useful method to develop an eHealth intervention based on both theory and evidence. All patients and stakeholders judged the eHealth intervention to be a promising tool to empower gynecological patients during the perioperative period and to help them to return to normal activities and work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.1915

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Thiel JA, Kamencic H. Assessment of costs associated with outpatient total laparoscopic hysterectom. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2006 Sep;28(9):794-798. [Medline: 17022920]
  2. de Vries H. Determinanten van gedrag. In: Gezondheidsvoorlichting en gedragsverandering [Health Education and Behavioral Change]. Assen: Van Gorcum; 1993:109-132.
  3. Ajzen I. From intentions to action: a theory of planned behaviour. In: Action-Control: From Cognition to Behaviour. Heidelberg: Springer; 1985:11-39.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vonk Noordegraaf, A., Huirne, J. A. F., Pittens, C. A., van Mechelen, W., Broerse, J. E. W., Brölmann, H. A. M., & Anema, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2012-10-19
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
e124
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974232493
Cited by
54
References
79
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • ZonMw (150020037)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
digital health interventions, gynecologic surgery, return to work, return to normal activity, postoperative recovery, sick leave, work disability prevention, patient empowerment, intervention mapping, work reintegration, patient education, postoperative care
MeSH terms
Employment, Female, Humans, Power, Psychological, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Focus Groups, Sick Leave, Self Efficacy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review