Clinical AI in Canadian Community Hospitals: A Framework for Implementation Readiness
Open accessAbstract
Clinical Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are frequently developed in academic centres yet deployed in community hospitals with different workflows, staffing, and oversight. In Canada, where community hospitals constitute approximately 90% of hospitals, this creates a validation-to-implementation gap. Health Canada’s 2026 pre-market guidance for machine learning-enabled medical devices addresses manufacturer responsibilities but leaves hospital implementation responsibilities under-specified. This article proposes a framework for community hospital AI implementation readiness organized around four dimensions (contextual validity, sociotechnical workflow integration, calibrated human-AI reliance, and adaptive safety, equity, and governance), operationalized through simulation-based systems testing. The framework specifies what a community hospital must build to deploy a specific AI tool safely, extending an established Canadian tradition of simulation-based systems testing to the lifecycle risks of AI. A real Canadian deployment, the CHARTwatch early warning system, illustrates the dimensions in practice. Safe AI deployment in community hospitals is an institutional capacity, not a procurement decision. Leaders should treat implementation readiness as core infrastructure investment.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The article proposes a four-dimension framework—contextual validity, sociotechnical workflow integration, calibrated human-AI reliance, and adaptive safety/equity/governance—for assessing Canadian community hospital readiness to deploy specific clinical AI tools, operationalized through simulation-based systems testing. It argues that safe AI deployment is institutional capacity rather than a procurement decision, and that leaders should treat implementation readiness as core infrastructure investment.
Key findings
- The framework organizes readiness around four interdependent dimensions and three simulation modes (orientation/tabletop, workflow-integrated, adversarial/failure-mode) across five lifecycle phases; readiness is framed as a sustained institutional capability, not a one-time achievement.
- Community hospitals constitute approximately 90% of hospitals in Canada, while clinical research is concentrated in academic centres. The paper cites an Ontario cohort study of 947,070 general medicine encounters across 28 hospitals finding broadly similar patient characteristics between academic and community categories, but variation across individual hospitals exceeding variation between categories.
- Health Canada’s 2026 pre-market guidance for machine learning-enabled medical devices addresses manufacturer responsibilities—including Predetermined Change Control Plans, bias assessment through Sex and Gender Based Analysis Plus, and post-market performance monitoring—but hospital implementation responsibilities remain under-specified. A cited review of 77 healthcare AI governance frameworks found only 13% included all core components, with explicit oversight mechanisms among the least commonly included.
- CHARTwatch, a machine learning-based early warning system at St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto, is used as an illustration: it was deployed after approximately 3 years of local development and validation, with clinician orientation, specified alert response pathways, and ongoing monitoring; a non-randomized controlled evaluation associated its use with a reduction in non-palliative in-hospital deaths among patients identified as high risk. The paper notes this readiness was built at an academic centre with embedded data science, informatics, and evaluation capacity.
Methods
- Conceptual analysis based on published literature and publicly available regulatory guidance; no datasets were generated or analyzed, and no human participants, animal subjects, or identifiable personal health information were involved, so ethics review and consent were not required.
- Develops a framework for AI-enabled clinical decision support and predictive systems; extension to generative AI systems, including large language models for clinical documentation and ambient scribing, is stated as beyond current scope.
- Uses the CHARTwatch deployment as a real Canadian illustration of the framework dimensions; no new empirical testing of the framework is reported.
Limitations
- Stated: the framework is proposed as a conceptual and operational structure rather than a validated intervention; empirical testing across community hospital settings, tool types, and regional contexts remains a research agenda.
- Stated: it is developed for Canadian community hospitals under current regulatory conditions, and adaptation would be required for other jurisdictions or for generative AI systems.
- Evident from the text: no primary data are reported; CHARTwatch is an academic-centre example, and the paper itself notes the question of how community hospitals can build comparable readiness without comparable embedded capacity. The provided text also truncates the limitations section mid-sentence after “Framework claims about clinician.”
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 33 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Interpretationreasoning
The level of readiness achieved for CHARTwatch was constructed at an academic centre with embedded data science, informatics, and evaluation capacity.
“This level of readiness was constructed at an academic centre with embedded data science, informatics, and evaluation capacity; the question for community hospitals is how to build comparable readiness without comparable embedded capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In a non-randomized controlled evaluation, use of CHARTwatch was associated with a reduction in non-palliative in-hospital deaths among patients identified as high risk.
“In a non-randomized controlled evaluation, use of the system was associated with a reduction in non-palliative in-hospital deaths among patients identified as high risk.16”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Simulation-based systems testing generates implementation evidence: documented latent safety threats, workflow redesigns triggered by observed failures, characterization of reliance behaviours, and rehearsed governance escalation.
“Simulation-based systems testing generates implementation evidence: Documented latent safety threats, workflow redesigns triggered by observed failures, characterization of reliance behaviours, and rehearsed governance escalation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
CHARTwatch was deployed at St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto on the general internal medicine unit only after approximately 3 years of local development and validation.
“At St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto, the machine learning-based early warning system CHARTwatch was deployed on the general internal medicine unit only after approximately 3 years of local development and validation, and its phased implementation combined clinician orientation, clearly specified alert response pathways for the clinical teams receiving its outputs, and ongoing monitoring and”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Community hospitals typically operate with less developed infrastructure for generating, tracking, and applying local evidence.
“Community hospitals constitute approximately 90% of hospitals in Canada, yet clinical research is concentrated in academic centres, and community hospitals typically operate with less developed infrastructure for generating, tracking, and applying local evidence.[4][5][6][7]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [4]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
An established Canadian tradition uses simulation not primarily as learner education but as a method for organizational systems testing.
“An established Canadian tradition uses simulation not primarily as learner education but as a method for organizational systems testing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [14]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Community hospitals constitute approximately 90% of hospitals in Canada.
“Community hospitals constitute approximately 90% of hospitals in Canada, yet clinical research is concentrated in academic centres, and community hospitals typically operate with less developed infrastructure for generating, tracking, and applying local evidence.[4][5][6][7]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [4]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
None of the existing frameworks (NASSS, SEIPS, DECIDE-AI, FUTURE-AI) specifies how a specific hospital tests whether it is prepared to deploy a specific AI tool in its own workflow.
“Existing frameworks contribute essential but partial guidance: The NASSS framework diagnoses where implementation complexity resides 11 ; SEIPS supplies the sociotechnical architecture through which safety emerges from interactions among people, tasks, tools, and organization 12 ; DECIDE-AI shapes how early clinical AI use should be reported 13 ; and FUTURE-AI specifies principles for what deploya”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [12]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Colman and colleagues formalized simulation-based clinical systems testing as a standardized methodology for identifying latent safety threats before patient exposure.
“Colman and colleagues formalized this as simulation-based clinical systems testing, providing a standardized methodology for identifying latent safety threats before patient exposure.14”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Implementation readiness is not a one-time achievement but a sustained institutional capability.
“Implementation readiness is therefore not a one-time achievement but a sustained institutional capability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Canadian case-study evidence describing early-stage development of hospital AI governance finds many governance elements are only now being established.
“Canadian case-study evidence describing early-stage development of hospital AI governance similarly finds many governance elements are only now being established.18”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Clinical research is concentrated in academic centres.
“Community hospitals constitute approximately 90% of hospitals in Canada, yet clinical research is concentrated in academic centres, and community hospitals typically operate with less developed infrastructure for generating, tracking, and applying local evidence.[4][5][6][7]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [4]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The finding of similar patient characteristics between academic and community hospitals shifts attention from patient-mix explanations toward organizational and infrastructural conditions.
“This finding shifts attention from patient-mix explanations toward organizational and infrastructural conditions, precisely the conditions that shape whether AI can be monitored, interpreted, and used safely.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Community hospitals are particularly informative sites for generating scholarship that makes safe deployment possible in the settings where most Canadian hospital care is delivered.
“If safe AI implementation is an emergent property of the tool in interaction with the organization, and community hospitals are distinct sociotechnical environments, then community hospitals are particularly informative sites for generating the scholarship that makes safe deployment possible in the settings where most Canadian hospital care is delivered.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Community hospitals are distinct sociotechnical environments.
- Rests on an assumption: Safe AI implementation is an emergent property of the tool in interaction with the organization.
- Interpretationcitation
Health Canada's 2026 pre-market guidance addresses manufacturer responsibilities but leaves hospital implementation responsibilities under-specified.
“Health Canada's 2026 pre-market guidance for machine learning-enabled medical devices addresses manufacturer responsibilities but leaves hospital implementation responsibilities under-specified.”
- Also stated in: § An Advancing Regulatory Context · plain
“These developments address manufacturer and regulator responsibilities.The corresponding responsibilities of hospitals, namely, how they prepare local workflows, staff, and governance to implement AI-enabled devices safely, remain comparatively under-specified.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § An Advancing Regulatory Context · plain
- Premisecitation
Alberta Health Services deployed related systems-simulation approaches during COVID-19 for province-wide workflow integration.
“Alberta Health Services deployed related systems-simulation approaches during COVID-19 for province-wide workflow integration.15”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Simulation provides prospective evidence about deployment conditions that governance bodies otherwise struggle to obtain.
“Simulation provides prospective evidence about deployment conditions that governance bodies otherwise struggle to obtain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Strong performance in model development or external validation does not reliably predict safe performance after deployment.
“A persistent finding, however, is that strong performance in model development or external validation does not reliably predict safe performance after deployment; long-term reliability depends on post-deployment surveillance, contextual fit, and active human oversight.[1][2][3]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [1]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [2]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 11
- May combine two claims. 11
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAdversarial simulation can be delivered through structured case discussions.
“Adversarial simulation can be delivered through structured case discussions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenHospitals control local workflow integration, staffing, escalation pathways, local monitoring infrastructure, and simulation-based implementation testing.
“Hospitals control local workflow integration, staffing, escalation pathways, local monitoring infrastructure, and simulation-based implementation testing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe core requirement for simulation-based systems testing is deliberate scenario design and systematic observation of work-as-done, not technological fidelity.
“The core requirement is deliberate scenario design and systematic observation of work-as-done, not technological fidelity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenClinical AI is entering community hospitals faster than the infrastructure to deploy it safely.
“Clinical AI is entering community hospitals faster than the infrastructure to deploy it safely.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Clinical AI tools are frequently developed in academic centres yet deployed in community hospitals with different workflows, staffing, and oversight.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenClinicians control interpretation, override, documentation, and communication with patients.
“Clinicians control interpretation, override, documentation, and communication with patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHealth Canada controls pre-market authorization, the boundaries of the PCCP, and the terms and conditions applied to licences throughout the device lifecycle.
“Health Canada controls pre-market authorization, the boundaries of the PCCP, and the terms and conditions applied to licences throughout the device lifecycle.9,10”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [9]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSafe AI deployment in community hospitals will depend not only on model quality but on whether leaders build and rehearse the local conditions that make responsible use possible.
“Safe AI deployment in community hospitals will depend not only on model quality but on whether leaders build and rehearse the local conditions that make responsible use possible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Safe AI implementation is an emergent property of the tool in interaction with the organization.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA hospital cannot fix a poorly trained model; a manufacturer cannot fix a local workflow.
“A hospital cannot fix a poorly trained model; a manufacturer cannot fix a local workflow.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLong-term reliability of clinical AI depends on post-deployment surveillance, contextual fit, and active human oversight.
“A persistent finding, however, is that strong performance in model development or external validation does not reliably predict safe performance after deployment; long-term reliability depends on post-deployment surveillance, contextual fit, and active human oversight.[1][2][3]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [1]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [2]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHealth Canada's Pre-market Guidance for Machine Learning-Enabled Medical Devices (April 2026) establishes lifecycle expectations for AI/ML devices, including Predetermined Change Control Plans, bias assessment through Sex and Gender Based Analysis Plus, and post-market performance monitoring.
“Health Canada's Pre-market Guidance for Machine Learning-Enabled Medical Devices (April 2026) establishes lifecycle expectations for AI/ML devices, including Predetermined Change Control Plans, bias assessment through Sex and Gender Based Analysis Plus, and post-market performance monitoring.9”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenManufacturers control the model, its training data, its retraining processes, and much of what appears in the Predetermined Change Control Plan.
“Manufacturers control the model, its training data, its retraining processes, and much of what appears in the Predetermined Change Control Plan.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA recent Ontario cohort study of 947,070 general medicine encounters across 28 hospitals found broadly similar patient characteristics between academic and community categories, with variation across individual hospitals exceeding the variation between categories.
“A recent Ontario cohort study of 947,070 general medicine encounters across 28 hospitals found broadly similar patient characteristics between academic and community categories, with variation across individual hospitals exceeding the variation between categories.8”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenOrientation and tabletop simulation require only a meeting room and the actual clinicians.
“Orientation and tabletop simulation require only a meeting room and the actual clinicians.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationComplementary regulatory amendments effective January 2026 permit the Minister of Health to impose or amend terms and conditions on medical device licences throughout the device lifecycle.
“Complementary regulatory amendments effective January 2026 permit the Minister of Health to impose or amend terms and conditions on medical device licences throughout the device lifecycle.10”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningWorkflow-integrated simulation can be conducted in situ using existing staff during protected time.
“Workflow-integrated simulation can be conducted in situ using existing staff during protected time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCHARTwatch's phased implementation combined clinician orientation, clearly specified alert response pathways, and ongoing monitoring and evaluation.
“At St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto, the machine learning-based early warning system CHARTwatch was deployed on the general internal medicine unit only after approximately 3 years of local development and validation, and its phased implementation combined clinician orientation, clearly specified alert response pathways for the clinical teams receiving its outputs, and ongoing monitoring and”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAmong 77 healthcare AI governance frameworks reviewed internationally, only 13% included all core components, and explicit oversight mechanisms were among the least commonly included.
“Recent Canadian evidence indicates that organizational AI governance remains operationally immature: Among 77 healthcare AI governance frameworks reviewed internationally, only 13% included all core components, and explicit oversight mechanisms were among the least commonly included.17”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
Clinical AI tools are frequently developed in academic centres yet deployed in community hospitals with different workflows, staffing, and oversight.
“Clinical Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are frequently developed in academic centres yet deployed in community hospitals with different workflows, staffing, and oversight.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Community hospitals are distinct sociotechnical environments.
“If safe AI implementation is an emergent property of the tool in interaction with the organization, and community hospitals are distinct sociotechnical environments, then community hospitals are particularly informative sites for generating the scholarship that makes safe deployment possible in the settings where most Canadian hospital care is delivered.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Safe AI implementation is an emergent property of the tool in interaction with the organization.
“If safe AI implementation is an emergent property of the tool in interaction with the organization, and community hospitals are distinct sociotechnical environments, then community hospitals are particularly informative sites for generating the scholarship that makes safe deployment possible in the settings where most Canadian hospital care is delivered.”
Cites
Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Papoutsi, C., Lynch, J., Hughes, G., A'Court, C., Hinder, S., Fahy, N., Procter, R., & Shaw, S. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.8775 · Cited by 2,887 · see citing works
Holden, R. J., Carayon, P., Gurses, A. P., Hoonakker, P., Hundt, A. S., Ozok, A. A., & Rivera-Rodriguez, A. J. (2013) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2013.838643 · Cited by 1,221 · see citing works
Vasey, B., Nagendran, M., Campbell, B., Clifton, D. A., Collins, G. S., Denaxas, S., Denniston, A. K., Faes, L., Geerts, B., Ibrahim, M., et al. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01772-9 · Cited by 1,039 · see citing works
Lekadir, K., Frangi, A. F., Porras, A. R., Glocker, B., Cintas, C., Langlotz, C. P., Weicken, E., Asselbergs, F. W., Prior, F., Collins, G. S., et al. (2025) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2024-081554 · Cited by 957 · see citing works
The Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence
Finlayson, S. G., Subbaswamy, A., Singh, K., Bowers, J., Kupke, A., Zittrain, J., Kohane, I. S., & Saria, S. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmc2104626 · Cited by 855 · see citing works
Vasey, B., Nagendran, M., Campbell, B., Clifton, D. A., Collins, G. S., Denaxas, S., Denniston, A. K., Faes, L., Geerts, B., Ibrahim, M., et al. (2022) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-070904 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Simulation-based clinical systems testing for healthcare spaces: from intake through implementation
Colman, N., Doughty, C. B., Arnold, J. L., Stone, K. P., Reid, J. R., Dalpiaz, A., & Hebbar, K. (2019) · Advances in Simulation · doi:10.1186/s41077-019-0108-7 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Detecting and Remediating Harmful Data Shifts for the Responsible Deployment of Clinical AI Models
Subasri, V., Krishnan, A., Kore, A., Dhalla, A., Pandya, D., Wang, B., Malkin, D., Razak, F., Verma, A. A., Goldenberg, A., et al. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13685 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Dubé, M., Kaba, A., Cronin, T., Barnes, S., Fuselli, T., & Grant, V. (2020) · Advances in Simulation · doi:10.1186/s41077-020-00138-w · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Clinical evaluation of a machine learning–based early warning system for patient deterioration
Verma, A. A., Stukel, T. A., Colacci, M., Bell, S., Ailon, J., Friedrich, J. O., Murray, J., Kuzulugil, S. S., Yang, Z., Lee, Y., et al. (2024) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.240132 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Establishing organizational AI governance in healthcare: a case study in Canada
Kim, J. Y., Hasan, A., Kueper, J., Tang, T., Hayes, C., Fine, B., Balu, S., & Sendak, M. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01909-3 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Governance for safe and responsible AI in healthcare organisations: a scoping review of frameworks
Wang, A., Freeman, S., & Magrabi, F. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02679-2 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Patient Complexity, Social Factors, and Hospitalization Outcomes at Academic and Community Hospitals
Colacci, M., Loffler, A., Roberts, S., Straus, S., Verma, A., & Razak, F. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54745 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Gehrke, P., Rego, K., Orlando, E., Jack, S. M., Law, M. P., Cook, D., Marticorena, R. M., Binnie, A., & Tsang, J. L. Y. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-024-02873-4 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Embedding a culture of research in Canadian community hospitals: a qualitative study
Rego, K., Gehrke, P., Law, M. P., et al. (2024) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-024-01243-2 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Developing a toolkit for building a community hospital clinical research program
Rego, K., Orlando, E., Archambault, P. M., et al. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-024-02883-2 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The research activities of Canadian community hospitals: A bibliometric analysis
Rego, K., Patel, P., Binnie, A., et al. (2025) · Healthcare Management Forum · doi:10.1177/08404704251345312 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Dubé, M. M., Kaba, A., Cronin, T., et al. (2021) · Advances in Simulation · doi:10.1186/s41077-021-00165-1 · Cited by 1
Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Papoutsi, C., et al. (2017) · doi:10.2196/preprints.8775
Governance for safe and responsible AI in healthcare organisations: A scoping review of frameworks
Wang, A., Freeman, S., & Magrabi, F. (2025) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7209096/v1
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Mohiyeddini, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Mohiyeddini, Changiz
- ORCID
- Mohiyeddini, Changiz
- Venue
- Healthcare Management Forum
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2026-10-15
- Pages
- 8404704261494446-8404704261494446
- ISSN
- 0840-4704 (ISSN-L)
- 2352-3883
- OpenAlex
- W7222038138
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Healthcare Management Forum (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
- Keywords
- clinical AI, community hospitals, implementation readiness, AI deployment, AI safety, AI equity, AI governance, early warning systems, Canadian health care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-27.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-27.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
