Cited by 153Family Dynamics and RelationshipsInfant Development and Preterm CareInfant Health and Development

Becoming an Involved Father of an Infant

Goodman, Janice H.·2005·Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing

Abstract

Unlabelled DATA OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience of fatherhood in the early months after the birth of an infant through a metasynthesis of relevant qualitative studies.Data sources Cinahl, PsychInfo, MEDLINE, and Social Work Abstracts electronic databases from 1990 through 2001 were searched using the terms qualitative, fathers, fatherhood, infants, father-infant relationship, and postpartum.Study selection Ten published articles, representing seven qualitative studies, focusing on the experiences of fathers of healthy infants were reviewed. Only studies published from 1990 through 2001 were selected to reflect more recent representations of fatherhood.Data extraction and synthesis Using Noblit and Hare's metasynthesis approach, each study was carefully read, and key metaphors from each study were compared and translated by applying each of the metaphors to all the other studies. The study translations were synthesized into a whole, and the synthesis refined, leading to a description of the experience of being the father of an infant.Conclusions The metasynthesis revealed that fathers of infants experienced four phases, represented by the following characteristics: (a) entering with expectations and intentions, (b) confronting reality, (c) creating one's role of involved father, and (d) reaping rewards. Contextual factors that influenced the father-infant relationship were identified. Implications for theory development, research, and clinical practice are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0884217505274581

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parents typically find themselves highly motivated to take care of their infants' needs and find interactions with infants rewarding.

    “parents typically find themselves highly motivated to take care of their infants’ needs and also find the interactions with infants rewarding (2,3).”

    From Neuroendocrinology of Parental Response to Baby‐Cry (2011) · cites this paper as [3]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodman, J. H.
Affiliations
MGH Institute of Health Professions (US)
Corresponding author
Goodman, Janice H.
Venue
Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-03
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
190-200
ISSN
  • 0090-0311 (ISSN-L)
  • 0884-2175
OpenAlex
W2164772726
Cited by
153
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
19.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
fatherhood, father-infant relationship, postpartum fathers, father involvement
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Feeding, Father-Child Relations, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Interpersonal Relations, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Paternal Behavior, Personal Satisfaction, Role, Social Responsibility, Time Management, Intention, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review