Cited by 106Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Gender Differences in Depression and Anxiety Among Victims of Intimate Partner Violence: The Moderating Effect of Shame Proneness

Shorey, Ryan C., Sherman, Amanda E., Kivisto, Aaron J., Elkins, Sara R., Rhatigan, Deborah L., Moore, Todd M.·2011·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

The current study examined the moderating role of shame proneness on the association between physical, psychological, and sexual intimate partner violence victimization and depressive and anxious symptoms among male and female college students ( N = 967). Students completed self-report measures of dating violence, depression, anxiety, and shame proneness. Results showed that shame proneness moderated the association between all forms of victimization and mental health symptoms. A three-way interaction revealed that sexual victimization predicted symptoms of anxiety to a greater extent for men than for women at high levels of shame proneness. Furthermore, results showed that gender moderated the association between physical and psychological victimization and health outcomes, such that victimization was related to increased depressive and anxious symptoms for men but not for women. Interpretations of these findings are discussed in relation to violence interventions, including primary prevention, and men’s health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260510372949

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shorey, R. C., Sherman, A. E., Kivisto, A. J., Elkins, S. R., Rhatigan, D. L., & Moore, T. M.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Shorey, Ryan C.
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2010-06-28
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
1834-1850
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W2067406502
Cited by
106
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
intimate partner violence, shame proneness, depression, anxiety, gender differences, sexual victimization, physical victimization, psychological victimization, dating violence, university students, men's mental health, violence prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Self Concept, Severity of Illness Index, Sexual Partners, Shame, Spouse Abuse, Students, United States, Sex Distribution, Crime Victims, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review