Cited by 97Stalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Sexting coercion as a component of intimate partner polyvictimization

Ross, Jody M., Drouin, Michelle, Coupe, Amanda·2019·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

We examined the role of sexting coercion as a component of the intimate partner abuse (IPA) construct among young adults to determine whether sexting coercion would emerge alongside other forms of partner aggression as a cumulative risk factor for psychological, sexual, and attachment problems. In a sample of 885 undergraduates (301 men and 584 women), 40% had experienced some type of coercion. Although there was some overlap between sexual coercion and sexting coercion (21% of participants had experienced both), some individuals had experienced only sexting coercion (8%) and some only sexual coercion (11%). Women were more likely than men to be coerced into sexting. Both sexting coercion and sexual coercion were significantly and independently related to negative mental health symptoms, sexual problems, and attachment dysfunction, and, notably, sexting coercion was found to be a cumulative risk factor for nearly all of these negative effects. These data support the idea that digital sexual victimization is a new component of IPA polyvictimization, potentially increasing the negative effects experienced by victims of multiple forms of partner aggression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260516660300

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two studies found no association between avoidance and sexual IPV victimization or no differences on avoidance scores between individuals with and without sexual IPV victimization.

    “However, two studies did not go in the same direction, finding no association between avoidance and sexual IPV victimization (Karakurt et al., 2013) or no differences on avoidance scores between individuals with and without sexual IPV victimization (Ross et al., 2016).”
  • Ross et al. (2016) indicated that individuals with a history of sexual IPV scored higher on the anxious dimension of the ECR-S compared to participants without experiences of sexual IPV.

    “Also, results of Ross et al. (2016) indicated that individuals with history of sexual IPV scored higher on the anxious dimension of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Short form (ECR-S, Wei et al., 2007) compared to participants without experiences of sexual IPV.”
  • Prior intimate partner violence predicts subsequent sextortion, particularly during crisis periods such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “Prior intimate partner violence predicts subsequent sextortion particularly during crisis periods such as the COVID 19 pandemic when shared images are weaponized to maintain control (Ross et al., 2019; Bates, 2017; Eaton et al., 2023).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ross, J. M., Drouin, M., & Coupe, A.
Affiliations
Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne (US)
Corresponding author
Ross, Jody M.
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2016-07-20
Volume
34
Issue
11
Pages
2269-2291
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W2492200026
Cited by
97
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
13.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Opus: Research & Creativity (Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
intimate partner violence, polyvictimization, sexual coercion, cumulative risk factors, psychiatric symptoms, sexual dysfunction, young adults, gender differences
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Aggression, Coercion, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Risk Factors, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Students, Crime Victims, Young Adult, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review