The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Descriptive Model of the Offense Chain for Child Molesters
Abstract
A grounded theory approach was taken to the qualitative analysis of the descriptions of thoughts and feelings provided by 26 incarcerated child molesters while describing their most recent or typical offense. The resulting descriptive model comprised nine stages, with three contributing factors that describe the sequence of cognitive and behavioral events that form an offense chain. The model incorporates offender type, offense type, and offers a description of the possible interactions between the various stages and factors. The model was then applied to the offense descriptions of an independent sample of 12 incarcerated child molesters in order to ascertain its cross-sample validity and the reliability of classification. The results suggest that the model has provisional validity and adequate interrater reliability. The theoretical, research, and clinical implications of the descriptive model are then discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists
Strauss, A. L. (1987) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511557842 · Cited by 12,277
In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors.
Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.47.9.1102 · Cited by 8,596
Qualitative research and psychological theorizing
Henwood, K. L., & Pidgeon, N. F. (1992) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02426.x · Cited by 808
Cited by
Good lives and the rehabilitation of offenders
Ward, T. (2002) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1359-1789(01)00076-3 · Cited by 469
Self-citationSexual grooming of children: Review of literature and theoretical considerations
Craven, S., Brown, S., & Gilchrist, E. (2006) · Journal of Sexual Aggression · doi:10.1080/13552600601069414 · Cited by 455
The Cycle of Abuse: When Victims Become Offenders
Plummer, M., & Cossins, A. (2018) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838016659487 · Cited by 85
A self-regulation model of sexual grooming
Elliott, I. A. (2017) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838015591573 · Cited by 55
Ringenberg, T. R., Seigfried-Spellar, K., & Rayz, J. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.108071 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- WARD, T., LOUDEN, K., HUDSON, S. M., & MARSHALL, W. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Interpersonal Violence
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 452-472
- ISSN
- 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6518
- OpenAlex
- W2157227074
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.