Cited by 32Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyNutritional Studies and DietMethodologies in Health Research and Practice

Nutrition study design issues: important issues for interpretation.

Open access
Gardner, Christopher D., Crimarco, Anthony, Landry, Matthew J., Fielding-Singh, Priya·2020·American Journal of Health Promotion

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0890117120960580d

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gardner, C. D., Crimarco, A., Landry, M. J., & Fielding-Singh, P.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Corresponding author
Gardner, Christopher D.
Venue
American Journal of Health Promotion
Published
2020-10-19
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
951-954
ISSN
  • 0890-1171 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6602
OpenAlex
W3093324185
Cited by
32
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Health Promotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL007034)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK116074)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
Keywords
study interpretation, dietary assessment, study design flaws
MeSH terms
Humans, Nutritional Status, Research Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review