Cited by 1,972Diet and metabolism studiesDietary Effects on HealthNutritional Studies and Diet

Comparison of Weight-Loss Diets with Different Compositions of Fat, Protein, and Carbohydrates

Open access
Sacks, Frank M., Bray, George A., Carey, Vincent J., Smith, Steven R., Ryan, Donna H., Anton, Stephen D., McManus, Katherine, Champagne, Catherine M. +9 more·2009·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The possible advantage for weight loss of a diet that emphasizes protein, fat, or carbohydrates has not been established, and there are few studies that extend beyond 1 year. METHODS: We randomly assigned 811 overweight adults to one of four diets; the targeted percentages of energy derived from fat, protein, and carbohydrates in the four diets were 20, 15, and 65%; 20, 25, and 55%; 40, 15, and 45%; and 40, 25, and 35%. The diets consisted of similar foods and met guidelines for cardiovascular health. The participants were offered group and individual instructional sessions for 2 years. The primary outcome was the change in body weight after 2 years in two-by-two factorial comparisons of low fat versus high fat and average protein versus high protein and in the comparison of highest and lowest carbohydrate content. RESULTS: At 6 months, participants assigned to each diet had lost an average of 6 kg, which represented 7% of their initial weight; they began to regain weight after 12 months. By 2 years, weight loss remained similar in those who were assigned to a diet with 15% protein and those assigned to a diet with 25% protein (3.0 and 3.6 kg, respectively); in those assigned to a diet with 20% fat and those assigned to a diet with 40% fat (3.3 kg for both groups); and in those assigned to a diet with 65% carbohydrates and those assigned to a diet with 35% carbohydrates (2.9 and 3.4 kg, respectively) (P>0.20 for all comparisons). Among the 80% of participants who completed the trial, the average weight loss was 4 kg; 14 to 15% of the participants had a reduction of at least 10% of their initial body weight. Satiety, hunger, satisfaction with the diet, and attendance at group sessions were similar for all diets; attendance was strongly associated with weight loss (0.2 kg per session attended). The diets improved lipid-related risk factors and fasting insulin levels. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced-calorie diets result in clinically meaningful weight loss regardless of which macronutrients they emphasize. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00072995.)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa0804748

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

23 of 62 cited sources checked · 11 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Low-carbohydrate diet trials have reported very low urinary ketosis after six months, suggesting that sustaining low carbohydrate intake is futile for most overweight people.

    “In addition, trials of low-carbohydrate diets have reported a very low incidence of urinary ketosis after 6 months,6,8,12 suggesting that in most overweight people, it is futile to sustain a low intake of carbohydrates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [6] source
    • cites [8] source
    • cites [12] source

      The Dietary Intake, Energy Expenditure, and Urinary Ketones section reports low detectable urinary ketones at 24 months (8.3% in the low-carbohydrate group), not at six months. Contrary to the claimed futility of sustaining low carbohydrate intake, it reports lower carbohydrate intake in that group, and the Discussion describes the diet as an effective alternative after two years. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Short-term trials comparing low-carbohydrate, high-protein diets with conventional high-carbohydrate, low-fat diets have yielded inconsistent results.

    “Several trials showed that low-carbohydrate, high-protein diets resulted in more weight loss over the course of 3 to 6 months than conventional high-carbohydrate, low-fat diets,4–12 but other studies did not show this effect.13–17”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 10 sources checked
    • cites [4] source
    • cites [5] source
    • cites [6] source
    • cites [7] source
    • cites [8] source
    • cites [9] source
    • cites [10] source
    • cites [11] source
    • cites [12] source

      The Weight Loss section reports that weight loss was greatest during months 1–6 and was greater in the low-carbohydrate group than in the low-fat group. This supports one outcome described in the citing sentence, but this paper does not establish that short-term trials yielded inconsistent results or that its own trial failed to show the effect. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [13] source
  • Premisecitation

    Trials with one-year follow-up have not shown low-carbohydrate, high-protein diets to be superior to high-carbohydrate, low-fat diets.

    “A smaller group of studies that extended the follow-up to 1 year did not show that low-carbohydrate, high-protein diets were superior to high-carbohydrate, low-fat diets.6,10,16,18–21”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 7 sources checked
    • cites [6] source
    • cites [10] source
    • cites [16] source
    • cites [18] source
    • cites [19] source
    • cites [20] source
    • cites [21] source
  • Premisecitation

    At six months, the mean differences among diet groups in fat, carbohydrate, or protein intake were often larger than those in several earlier weight-loss trials.

    “The mean differences among the groups in fat, carbohydrate, or protein intake at 6 months were nevertheless often greater than those in several previous trials comparing diets for weight loss.11,12,19,21,26”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [11] source
    • cites [12] source

      Table 2 reports six-month differences among the diet groups in fat, carbohydrate, and protein intake. The Dietary Intake section also describes these differences, but our copy does not establish that they were often greater than those in several previous weight-loss trials. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [19] source
    • cites [21] source
    • cites [26] source
  • Findingown data

    The trial did not confirm earlier findings that low-carbohydrate or high-protein diets caused greater weight loss at six months and that this advantage eroded by twelve months.

    “We did not confirm previous findings that low-carbohydrate or high-protein diets caused increased weight loss at 6 months3–12 and that the advantage of these diets usually eroded by 12 months, with weight loss that was nearly or fully equivalent to that with low-fat diets6,11,18 or other diets.12”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 10 sources checked
    • cites [3] source

      The Weight Loss and Body Composition sections say that reduced-calorie diets produce weight loss and that macronutrient composition does not seem to play a major role. Our copy does not report the attributed comparison—greater loss on low-carbohydrate or high-protein diets at six months followed by convergence at twelve months. Searches for those time points and comparative findings found no passage addressing them. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [4] source
    • cites [5] source
    • cites [6] source
    • cites [7] source

      The Weight Loss section reports significantly greater weight loss with the low-carbohydrate diet than with the low-fat diet at six months. The paper studied only six months and says it is unclear whether the benefits extend beyond that point; it cannot support the claim that the weight-loss advantage eroded by twelve months. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [8] source
    • cites [9] source

      The Introduction reports earlier studies finding greater weight loss with very-low-carbohydrate diets after three and six months. But the Methods (Experimental Approach; no page given) say this trial tested diets for only 30 days in women and 50 days in men; it could not establish whether a six-month advantage eroded by twelve months. The citing authors’ statement that they did not confirm earlier findings is their own conclusion, not a finding of this trial. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [10] source
    • cites [11] source
    • cites [12] source

      The Weight Loss section reports greater weight loss with the low-carbohydrate diet than with the low-fat diet, consistent with an early advantage. It does not establish that this advantage eroded to near-equivalence by 12 months; it reports greater low-carbohydrate weight loss at 24 months. The citing authors’ statement that they ‘did not confirm’ earlier findings describes their own trial, not Shai et al.’s. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. 28
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 7
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Whether emphasizing protein, fat, or carbohydrates in the diet gives a weight-loss advantage has not been settled, and few trials have followed participants for more than one year.

    “The possible advantage for weight loss of a diet that emphasizes protein, fat, or carbohydrates has not been established, and there are few studies that extend beyond 1 year.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [1] source
    • cites [2] source
    • cites [3] source

      The Body Composition and Summary and Recommendations sections say that macronutrient composition does not seem to play a major role in weight loss and that its effect on long-term maintenance remains unclear, supporting the lack of an established advantage. Evidence-Based Guidelines identifies limited study duration as a problem, but the copy does not say that few studies extend beyond one year. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Diets that successfully cause weight loss can emphasize a range of fat, protein, and carbohydrate compositions that also improve cardiovascular and diabetes risk factors.

    “In conclusion, diets that are successful in causing weight loss can emphasize a range of fat, protein, and carbohydrate compositions that have beneficial effects on risk factors for cardiovascular disease and diabetes.29,40”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [29] source

      The section “Balance Calorie Intake and Physical Activity to Achieve or Maintain a Healthy Body Weight” (page unavailable) says macronutrient composition has little effect on energy balance unless it changes total energy intake or expenditure. The paper also links healthy weight and diet to cardiovascular risk, but it does not establish that weight-loss diets across a range of fat, protein, and carbohydrate compositions all improve both cardiovascular and diabetes risk factors. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [40] source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) describes diets with varied macronutrient compositions that have shown reduced cardiovascular risk factors or short-term weight loss. The Discussion, under “Implications for practice” (page unavailable), reports cardiovascular benefits from OmniHeart diets in participants who did not lose weight. The paper therefore supports the potential benefits of different compositions, but does not establish that a range of weight-loss diets also improves both cardiovascular and diabetes risk factors. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Blinding was maintained by using similar foods for each diet, and investigators and staff who measured outcomes did not know participants' diet assignments.

    “Blinding was maintained by the use of similar foods for each diet. Staff and participants were taught that each diet adhered to principles of a healthful diet29 and that each had been recommended for long-term weight loss, thereby establishing equipoise.1,2,26 Investigators and staff who measured outcomes were unaware of the diet assignment of the participants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [29] source
    • cites [1] source
    • cites [2] source
    • cites [26] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The study was a randomized clinical trial comparing energy-reduced diets that differed in macronutrient targets while otherwise following cardiovascular health recommendations.

    “We designed a randomized clinical trial to compare the effects on body weight of energy-reduced diets that differed in their targets for intake of macronutrients — low or high in fat, average or high in protein, or low or high in carbohydrates — and otherwise followed recommendations for cardiovascular health.29”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Only two trials have reported dietary intake beyond one year, and one of them provided food to participants.

    “Only two trials have reported dietary intake beyond 1 year,12,26 and one of them provided foods to the participants.12”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [12] source
    • cites [26] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Other studies have shown greater weight loss at one to two years with diets high in unsaturated fat or with low-fat, high-carbohydrate vegetarian diets.

    “Other studies showed increased weight loss at 1 to 2 years with diets that were high in unsaturated fat12,21,26 or with low-fat, high-carbohydrate vegetarian diets.22,24”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [12] source
    • cites [21] source

      The Abstract reports weight loss after 52 weeks in the high-monounsaturated-fat group, but explicitly finds no diet effect: weight loss was not significantly greater than with the high-protein diet. The study provides one-year results, not two-year results. The vegetarian-diet clause is attached to other citations, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [26] source
    • cites [22] source
    • cites [24] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Blood pressure fell by 1 to 2 mm Hg from baseline, with no significant differences among diet groups.

    “Blood pressure decreased from baseline by 1 to 2 mm Hg, with no significant differences among the groups (P>0.59 for all comparisons).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among completers, average weight loss was 4 kg, and 14% to 15% lost at least 10% of initial body weight.

    “Among the 80% of participants who completed the trial, the average weight loss was 4 kg; 14 to 15% of the participants had a reduction of at least 10% of their initial body weight.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Satiety, hunger, diet satisfaction, and attendance at group sessions were similar across all diets.

    “Satiety, hunger, satisfaction with the diet, and attendance at group sessions were similar for all diets;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The metabolic syndrome was present in 32% of participants at baseline and was lower at two years, ranging from 19% to 22% across diet groups.

    “The metabolic syndrome35 was present in 32% of the participants at baseline, and the percentage was lower at 2 years, ranging from 19 to 22% in the four diet groups (P = 0.81 for the four-way comparison).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [35]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Adherence to the protein goal was associated with more weight loss only in high-protein groups, and adherence to the fat goal only in low-fat groups.

    “Adherence to the goal for protein intake was associated with more weight loss only in the high-protein groups, and adherence to the goal for fat intake was associated with more weight loss only in the low-fat groups (P<0.001) (Fig. 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The diets improved lipid-related risk factors and fasting insulin levels.

    “The diets improved lipid-related risk factors and fasting insulin levels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Serious adverse events occurred in 57 participants (7%), with no significant differences among diets.

    “Serious adverse events were reported by 57 participants (7%); there were no significant differences in the rates among diets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All diets except the highest-carbohydrate diet lowered fasting serum insulin by 6% to 12%, with a larger decrease in the high-protein than average-protein diet (10% vs. 4%; P=0.07).

    “All the diets except the one with the highest carbohydrate content decreased fasting serum insulin levels by 6 to 12%; the decrease was larger with the high-protein diet than with the average-protein diet (10% vs. 4%, P = 0.07).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants were eager to lose weight and to try their assigned diet, and they performed well on motivation screening.

    “The participants were eager to lose weight and to attempt whatever type of diet they were assigned, and they did well in screening interviews and questionnaires that evaluated their motivation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many weight-loss trials are limited by small samples, few men, limited generalizability, unblinded outcome assessment, missing adherence data, and high dropout.

    “Small samples, underrepresentation of men, limited generalizability, a lack of blinded ascertainment of the outcome, a lack of data on adherence to assigned diets, and a large loss to follow-up limit the interpretation of many weight-loss trials.27”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Weight loss usually peaks between six and twelve months after starting a diet and is then followed by gradual regain.

    “We studied weight change over the course of 2 years, since weight loss typically is greatest 6 to 12 months after initiation of the diet, with steady regain of weight subsequently.28”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The authors view attendance at counseling sessions as a proxy for commitment to weight loss and engagement in the program.

    “We view attendance at counseling sessions as a proxy for commitment to achieving weight loss and for engagement in the program.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Random assignment to the four diet groups was generated by the coordinating center data manager after eligibility was confirmed.

    “Random assignments to one of four diet groups were generated by the data manager at the coordinating center on request of a study dietitian, after eligibility of a participant was confirmed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Of 1638 screened participants, 811 were randomized and 645 completed the two-year study.

    “Of 1638 participants who were screened, 811 (50%) were randomly assigned to a diet, and 645 (80% of those assigned) completed the study (i.e., provided a body-weight measurement at 2 years) (Fig. 1 in the Supplementary Appendix).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study had a large sample, a high retention rate, and sensitivity to detect small weight changes.

    “The study had a large sample, a high rate of retention, and the sensitivity to detect small changes in weight.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The findings should be directly applicable to clinicians' weight-loss recommendations for individual patients and to public health recommendations for populations.

    “Thus, the findings should be directly applicable to both clinicians’ recommendations for weight loss in individual patients and the development of population-wide recommendations by public health officials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study population was diverse in age, income, and geography and included a large proportion of men.

    “The population was diverse with respect to age, income, and geography and included a large percentage of men.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The diets improved lipid risk factors and fasting insulin in the directions expected from their macronutrient content.

    “The diets improved lipid risk factors and fasting insulin levels in the directions that would be expected on the basis of macronutrient content.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The primary analysis was intention-to-treat, with weight and waist circumference for early withdrawals imputed using monthly regain rates.

    “We performed an intention-to-treat analysis in which long-term weight loss for persons who withdrew from the study early (after at least 6 months of participation) was imputed on the basis of a rate of 0.3 kg per month of regained weight34 and a rate of 0.3 cm per month of regained waist circumference after withdrawal (see Methods in the Supplementary Appendix).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Biomarker changes confirmed that group differences in macronutrient intake matched dietary reports and that participants moved toward their assigned goals, though not fully.

    “Thus, changes in biomarkers confirmed that differences among the groups in macronutrient intake were consistent with those recorded in the dietary reports and that participants modified their intake of macronutrients in the direction of the goals, although the targets were not fully achieved.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The adherence findings suggest that participants in weight-loss programs return to their usual macronutrient intakes over time but may still maintain weight loss.

    “Overall, these findings with respect to adherence to macronutrient goals suggest that participants in weight-loss programs revert to their customary macronutrient intakes over time but may nonetheless be able to maintain weight loss.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study was approved by institutional human subjects committees and an NHLBI-appointed data and safety monitoring board, and all participants gave written informed consent.

    “The study was approved by the human subjects committee at each institution and by a data and safety monitoring board appointed by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. All participants gave written informed consent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Baseline characteristics were similar across the four diet groups and between assigned and completing participants.

    “Baseline characteristics were similar among participants assigned to the four diets and between those who were assigned to a diet and those who completed the study (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    A generic approach was used to develop each diet and its instructions in order to minimize nonbiologic influences.

    “We used a generic approach to developing each diet and the instructions for following it, in order to minimize such influences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    No diet was treated as a control, and dietary counseling and attention were the same for all diet groups throughout the study.

    “No diet was considered to be a control diet, and the dietary counseling and the attention that we provided were the same for all diet groups throughout the study period.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
31 of 31
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Nonnutritional factors such as cultural norms, scientific novelty, and media attention can influence the success of a specific diet.

    “Conformity to cultural norms, scientific novelty, and media attention are nonbiologic reasons for the success of specific diets.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The novelty of a diet, media attention, and researcher enthusiasm can affect how well participants adhere to any diet.

    “The novelty of the diet, media attention, and the enthusiasm of the researchers could affect the adherence of participants to any type of diet.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sacks, F. M., Bray, G. A., Carey, V. J., Smith, S. R., Ryan, D. H., Anton, S. D., McManus, K., Champagne, C. M., Bishop, L. M., Laranjo, N., Leboff, M. S., Rood, J. C., de Jonge, L., Greenway, F. L., Loria, C. M., Obarzanek, E., & Williamson, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
  • From the Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health (F.M.S., L.M.B.); the Channing Laboratory (F.M.S., V.J.C., N.L.) and the Endocrine Division (M.S.L.), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; and the Department of Nutrition, Brigham and Women's Hospital (K.M.) — all in Boston; Pennington Biomedical Research Center of the Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge (G.A.B., S.R.S., D.H.R., S.D.A., C.M.C., J.C.R., L.J., F.L.G., D.A.W.); and the...
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2009-02-26
Volume
360
Issue
9
Pages
859-873
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2144376568
Cited by
1,966
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 160 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 104 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 120 · 2015: 123 · 2014: 130 · 2013: 156 · 2012: 159
FWCI
116.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG028740)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL073286, U01HL073286)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK072476, P30DK040561)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR02635, M01RR002635)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
weight loss diet, macronutrient composition, high-protein diet, low-fat diet, carbohydrate restriction, overweight adults, long-term weight loss, weight regain, dietary adherence, group instruction, lipid risk factors, fasting insulin
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Counseling, Diabetes Mellitus, Diet, Reducing, Dietary Fats, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Patient Compliance, Risk Factors, Satiation, Weight Loss, Diet, Fat-Restricted, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted, Waist Circumference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review