Cited by 378Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological disorders and treatments

Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson Disease: Impact on Quality of Life, Disability, and Caregiver Burden

Leroi, Iracema, McDonald, Kathryn, Pantula, Hiranmayi, Harbishettar, Vijay·2012·Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology

Abstract

Aim: To compare quality of life, level of disability, and caregiver burden in 3 groups of people with Parkinson disease (PD): those with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI), those with dementia (PDD), and those with no cognitive impairment (PD-NC). Background: Although the cognitive profile of those with PD-MCI and PDD has been well described, little is known about the personal and clinical impact of cognitive impairment and its impact on caregivers. Method: Quality of life and disability were measured in 3 groups of participants with PD (PD-NC, n = 54; PD-MCI, n = 48; and PDD, n = 25). The PD-MCI group was classified using Movement Disorder Society Task Force consensus criteria. Caregivers (n = 102) in the 3 groups were assessed using the Zarit Burden Inventory. Results: Both quality of life and caregiver burden were similar in the 2 groups without dementia but were significantly different in those with PDD. In contrast, global disability was progressively greater as cognition declined across the 3 PD groups: PD-NC < PD-MCI < PDD and on the Activities of Daily Living scale a step up in impairment was seen with the presence of any cognitive impairment. Conclusions: The presence of dementia significantly increases caregiver burden and decreases quality of life. However, even mild levels of cognitive impairment increase disability and overall functional impairment progresses in tandem with cognitive decline.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0891988712464823

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Treatment effects of current options vary and effect sizes are generally low.

    “Current treatment options include rehabilitation, cognitive remediation, physical exercise, cognitive enhancing medication, and various brain stimulation techniques (Cicerone et al., 2005; Leroi, McDonald, Pantula, & Harbishettar, 2012; Wallace, Ballard, Pouzet, Riedel, & Wettstein, 2011), yet treatment effects vary and effect sizes (ES) are generally low.”

    From Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive functioning in brain disorders: a meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Leroi, McDonald, Pantula, & Harbishettar, 2012

  • Current treatment options include rehabilitation, cognitive remediation, physical exercise, cognitive enhancing medication, and various brain stimulation techniques.

    “Current treatment options include rehabilitation, cognitive remediation, physical exercise, cognitive enhancing medication, and various brain stimulation techniques (Cicerone et al., 2005; Leroi, McDonald, Pantula, & Harbishettar, 2012; Wallace, Ballard, Pouzet, Riedel, & Wettstein, 2011), yet treatment effects vary and effect sizes (ES) are generally low.”

    From Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive functioning in brain disorders: a meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Leroi, McDonald, Pantula, & Harbishettar, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leroi, I., McDonald, K., Pantula, H., & Harbishettar, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Lytham Hospital (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Pantula, Hiranmayi
Venue
Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology
Published
2012-11-21
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
208-214
ISSN
  • 0891-9887 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5708
OpenAlex
W2059797715
Cited by
378
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 1
FWCI
12.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
  • Parkinson's UK (F-0606)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, cognitive impairment, Parkinson's disease dementia, mild cognitive impairment, quality of life, disability, caregiver burden, activities of daily living, functional disability, Zarit Burden Inventory
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Disability Evaluation, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Parkinson Disease, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Caregivers, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review