Cited by 46Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Multidimensional care burden in Parkinson-related dementia

Open access
Vatter, Sabina, McDonald, Kathryn R., Stanmore, Emma, Clare, Linda, Leroi, Iracema·2018·Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology

Abstract

Background and Objective: Providing care to people with Parkinson-related dementia (PwPRD) may result in significant stress, strain, and burden for life partners. A common measurement of life partner burden is the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), which considers “burden” as a unitary concept; however, burden is highly complex and most likely comprises several dimensions. This study aimed to explore the factor structure of the ZBI in life partners of PwPRD and to examine the relationships among the emerging factors and the demographic and clinical features. Methods: Life partners of PwPRD participated in home-based quantitative assessments and self-completed postal questionnaires. The assessment battery included ZBI, measures of relationship satisfaction, mood, stress, resilience, health, quality of life, feelings related to care provision, and sociodemographic questions. Data on PwPRDs’ motor and neuropsychiatric symptom severity were also elicited in home-based assessments. Results: An exploratory factor analysis (principal axis factoring) of ZBI, conducted with 127 life partners, revealed five burden dimensions: social and psychological constraints, personal strain, interference with personal life, concerns about future, and guilt. These burden factors were associated with lower relationship satisfaction, mental health, and resilience, and higher stress, anxiety, depression, resentment, negative strain, and PwPRD motor severity. In multiple linear regression analyses, where each factor score was the dependent variable, stress, negative strain, and resentment emerged as significant predictors of specific burden dimensions. Conclusions: Burden is a complex and multidimensional construct. Interventions should address specific types of burden among life partners of PwPRD to support couples’ relationships and maintain quality of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0891988718802104

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caregiving burden is a multidimensional construct encompassing social, emotional, psychological, physical, and economic consequences for the caregiver.

    “Caregiving burden is recognized as a multidimensional construct, encompassing social, emotional, psychological, physical, and economic consequences for the caregiver (Vatter et al., 2018).”

    From Support based on psychoeducation intervention to address quality of life and care burden among caregivers of patients with cancer: a randomized controlled trial (2025) · cites this paper as Vatter et al., 2018

    The title in our indexed copy identifies care burden in Parkinson’s-related dementia as multidimensional. The available passages do not describe its dimensions or establish the claimed social, emotional, psychological, physical, and economic consequences for caregivers. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vatter, S., McDonald, K. R., Stanmore, E., Clare, L., & Leroi, I.
Affiliations
  • Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Leroi, Iracema
Venue
Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology
Published
2018-09-24
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
319-328
ISSN
  • 0891-9887 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5708
OpenAlex
W2885845337
Cited by
46
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health Research, Research for Patient Benefit (PB-PG-0613-31058 / competition number 22)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
caregiver burden, Zarit Burden Interview, life partners, family caregivers, relationship satisfaction, caregiver stress, caregiver guilt, resilience, quality of life, motor impairment severity, neuropsychiatric symptoms
MeSH terms
Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Parkinson Disease, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review