The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanical properties of CF-reinforced PLA parts manufactured by fused deposition modeling
Abstract
Many parameters of fused deposition modeling (FDM) influence the resulting mechanical properties. This can become a key factor if those parts are intended for commercial applications. This study focuses on the influence of nozzle temperature and infill line orientations for parts made with short carbon fiber (CF)-reinforced polylactic acid (PLA). Tests bars made of PLA and PLA-CF composite were produced under carefully selected conditions. As expected, PLA-CF yields higher tensile properties compared to PLA, owing to the strengthening effect of high modulus CFs. Maximum tensile properties are attained for a nozzle temperature of 230°C, for both PLA and PLA-CF. This temperature was thus selected for probing the effects of infill orientations in test bars. Among the multiple orientations tested, the combination [0°, 15°, −15°] relative to the long axis of the test bar yields the highest levels of tensile properties for both PLA and PLA-CF over the “all-purpose” [45°, 135°] orientation. Annealing can also affect crystallinity and mechanical properties of manufactured parts. Through differential scanning calorimetric analyses, the degree of crystallinity was assessed for samples annealed under various conditions. Results show that annealing increases crystallinity in PLA and PLA-CF samples, with a lower cooling rate yielding higher values. The Young’s modulus exhibits the same behavior for annealed and as printed parts, with a lower cooling rate yielding higher modulus values. This is attributed to a relaxation of the material structure as well as to the orientation of polymer chains toward the CFs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Farah, S., Anderson, D. G., & Langer, R. (2016) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.012 · Cited by 3,443 · cited 1×
“and cooling rate experienced after part fabrication.(19,20) As with injection molding, the high cooling rates sometimes experienced in FDM can yield totally amorphous PLA products.”
BackgroundYang, C., Tian, X., Li, D., Cao, Y., Zhao, F., & Shi, C. (2017) · Journal of Materials Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.027 · Cited by 662
Cited by
Wickramasinghe, S., Do, T., & Tran, P. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12071529 · Cited by 1,052
Shanmugam, V., Das, O., Babu, K., Marimuthu, U., Veerasimman, A., Johnson, D. J., Neisiany, R. E., Hedenqvist, M. S., Ramakrishna, S., & Berto, F. (2021) · International Journal of Fatigue · doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106007 · Cited by 538
Al-Maharma, A. Y., Patil, S. P., & Markert, B. (2020) · Materials Research Express · doi:10.1088/2053-1591/abcc5d · Cited by 404
Shanmugam, V., Rajendran, D. J. J., Babu, K., Rajendran, S., Veerasimman, A., Marimuthu, U., Singh, S., Das, O., Neisiany, R. E., Hedenqvist, M. S., et al. (2021) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106925 · Cited by 268
El Magri, A., El Mabrouk, K., & Vaudreuil, S. (2021) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s10853-021-06172-x · Cited by 55
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Magri, A. E., El Mabrouk, K., Vaudreuil, S., & Touhami, M. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-05-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 581-595
- ISSN
- 0892-7057 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-7980
- OpenAlex
- W2945385738
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanical properties of CF-reinforced PLA parts manufactured by fused deposition modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0892705719847244
- The paper
- Magri, A. E., El Mabrouk, K., Vaudreuil, S., & Touhami, M. E. (2021). Mechanical properties of CF-reinforced PLA parts manufactured by fused deposition modeling. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705719847244
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.