The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Choosing the Right Words: The Development of Guidelines for the Selection of the “Appropriate” Crisis-Response Strategies
Abstract
Although crisis management has evolved rapidly over the past decade, the symbolic aspect of crisis management has been ignored. More specifically, little research has examined crisis-response strategies (public statements made after a crisis) to see how these messages can be used to shape public perceptions of the crisis and the organization in crisis. This article synthesizes existing literature to create a list of crisis-response strategies and develops a set of guidelines for appropriate use of a given strategy. The guidelines are based upon Attribution Theory and use the crisis situation and the publics as the factors that help to determine when a crisis-response strategy is appropriate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model
REYNOLDS, B., & W. SEEGER, M. (2005) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730590904571 · Cited by 1,287
Zavyalova, A., Pfarrer, M. D., Reger, R. K., & Shapiro, D. L. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0608 · Cited by 646
Researching corporate social responsibility communication: Themes, opportunities and challenges
Crane, A., & Glozer, S. (2016) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12196 · Cited by 418
A Blessing and a Curse: How CEOs’ Trait Empathy Affects Their Management of Organizational Crises
König, A., Graf-Vlachy, L., Bundy, J., & Little, L. M. (2020) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2017.0387 · Cited by 237
Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication
Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.020 · Cited by 105
“…organizational efforts to circumnavigate certain topics, speak about something else, downplay the significance of problematic behaviors in their past, ingratiate themselves by focusing on their positive contributions to society or distance the organization from immoral actors (cf. Coombs, 1995).”
BackgroundResponding to a Health Crisis on Facebook: The Effects of Response Timing and Message Appeal
Huang, Y., & DiStaso, M. (2020) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101909 · Cited by 63
Hudders, L., Lou, C., & de Brabandere, M. (2022) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2021.1963554 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Coombs, W. T.
- Venue
- Management Communication Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 447-476
- ISSN
- 0893-3189 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6798
- OpenAlex
- W2169399557
- Cited by
- 802
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.