Cited by 646Public Relations and Crisis CommunicationCorporate Identity and ReputationCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting

Managing the Message: The Effects of Firm Actions and Industry Spillovers on Media Coverage Following Wrongdoing

Zavyalova, Anastasiya, Pfarrer, Michael D., Reger, Rhonda K., Shapiro, Debra L.·2012·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

We contribute to research on the management of social perceptions by considering the relative effectiveness of a firm's technical and ceremonial actions in managing media coverage after its own or its competitors' wrongdoing. We examine these relationships in the context of product recalls by U.S. toy companies over the ten-year period 1998–2007. As hypothesized, firms with higher levels of wrongdoing experience less positive media coverage; however, this decline is mitigated during periods of higher industry wrongdoing. Additionally, we find support for a negative spillover effect: the tenor of media coverage about a focal firm is less positive if others in its industry recall products. Further, technical actions help firms attenuate the negative effect of their own wrongdoing on the tenor of media coverage, whereas ceremonial actions amplify this effect. In contrast, ceremonial actions are more effective in attenuating the negative effect of industry wrongdoing on the tenor of media coverage about a focal firm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amj.2010.0608

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Organizations that make claims perceived as ceremonial or superficial following negative events experience an increase in negative media coverage.

    “Recent research has found that organizations that make claims perceived as ceremonial or superficial following negative events or wrongdoing experience an increase in negative media coverage”

    From Strategic Silence: Withholding Certification Status as a Hypocrisy Avoidance Tactic (2018) · cites this paper as Zavyalova et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zavyalova, A., Pfarrer, M. D., Reger, R. K., & Shapiro, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Rice University (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
2012-10
Volume
55
Issue
5
Pages
1079-1101
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W2056985680
Cited by
646
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
73.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Keywords
corporate misconduct, media coverage, product recall, toy companies, industry spillovers, corporate crisis management, technical actions, corporate reputation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review