“I Suspect That the Pictures Are Stolen”: Romance Fraud, Identity Crime, and Responding to Suspicions of Inauthentic Identities
Open accessAbstract
Romance fraud impacts the lives of thousands of people globally. Financial losses exceed millions of dollars each year and are steadily increasing annually. It occurs when an offender uses the guise of an intimate relationship to gain a financial advantage. Offenders use a variety of platforms and communications methods to target victims and develop the required trust and rapport to defraud them. As part of this process, offenders use false identities. This can be through the misappropriation of a genuine person’s identity, or it can be through the stealing of photos and other images of a genuine person to create a false or fictitious identity. In this way, romance fraud encompasses two categories of victims: those who lose money through a relationship and those who are subject to identity crime by romance fraud offenders. This article examines how individuals responded to suspicions of inauthentic identities to a person they were communicating with online. It uses romance fraud complaints lodged with Scamwatch (an Australian online fraud porting portal) between July 2018 and July 2019 (inclusive). The qualitative analysis indicates that many complainants used an internet search to verify or refute their suspicions about their partner. This yielded substantiated results in many cases and confirmed that the offender’s identity was not genuine. The article explores the implications for this victim-based detection strategy. In doing this, it argues that while effective for romance fraud victims, responses can further exacerbate the ongoing harms experienced by those whose identities have been compromised by romance fraud offenders. The article concludes with a discussion about the future effectiveness of internet searches to reduce romance fraud and the impact of this strategy on third parties whose identities are compromised by offenders.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction
WALTHER, J. B. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023001001 · Cited by 4,798 · see citing works
Not a victimless crime: The impact of fraud on individual victims and their families
Button, M., Lewis, C., & Tapley, J. (2014) · Security Journal · doi:10.1057/sj.2012.11 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Jiang, L. C., Bazarova, N. N., & Hancock, J. T. (2011) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01393.x · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Whitty, M. T. (2013) · British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azt009 · Cited by 209 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Romance fraud “is a method used by offenders whereby they use the perception of a legitimate relationship in order to manipulate and exploit the victim” (Cross, 2020b, p. 3; see also Whitty, 2013).”
MethodNo laughing matter: Blaming the victim of online fraud
Cross, C. (2015) · International Review of Victimology · doi:10.1177/0269758015571471 · Cited by 197 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, based on the known victim blaming of fraud victims (Cross, 2015, 2018) and the sense of shame and stigma that they experience, there is a need to overcome the negative stereotype prior to advocating harder for this course of action.”
BackgroundSelf-citationOnline frauds: Learning from victims why they fall for these scams
Button, M., Nicholls, C. M., Kerr, J., & Owen, R. (2014) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/0004865814521224 · Cited by 193 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…liabilities, credit-related consequences; and reputational damage, criminal justice consequences (false arrest), and loss of time in seeking to repair the damage done to one’s identity (Albrecht et al., 2011; Berg, 2011; Burns &Roberts, 2013; Button et al., 2014a; Jorna et al., 2020;Milne, 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe complex experience of child pornography survivors
Gewirtz-Meydan, A., Walsh, W., Wolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (2018) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.03.031 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
The use of military profiles in romance fraud schemes
Cross, C., & Holt, T. J. (2021) · Victims & Offenders · doi:10.1080/15564886.2020.1850582 · Cited by 54 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Offenders will often employ a military identity and narrative to both capture the attention of a potential victim and then to justify subsequent financial requests (Cross & Holt, 2021).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lazarus, S., Whittaker, J. M., McGuire, M. R., & Platt, L. (2023) · Journal of Economic Criminology · doi:10.1016/j.jeconc.2023.100013 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Tainted Love: a Systematic Literature Review of Online Romance Scam Research
Bilz, A., Shepherd, L. A., & Johnson, G. I. (2023) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwad048 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“What action should l take?”: Help-seeking behaviours of those targeted by romance fraud
Meikle, W., & Cross, C. (2024) · Journal of Economic Criminology · doi:10.1016/j.jeconc.2024.100054 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationOnline love fraud and the experiences of indonesian women: a qualitative study
Niman, S., Parulian, T. S., & Rothhaar, T. (2023) · International Journal of Public Health Science (IJPHS) · doi:10.11591/ijphs.v12i3.22617 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Romance Fraud: Its Repercussions on Victims’ Wellbeing
Gauci, C., & Vella, M. G. (2025) · Women & Criminal Justice · doi:10.1080/08974454.2025.2600304 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Constructing Offender Typologies From Judicial Data: A Clustering Analysis of Sextortion Cases
Wang, F., & Pei, W. (2026) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/10790632261434143
- Authors
- Cross, C., & Layt, R.
- Affiliations
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Cross, Cassandra
- ORCID
- Cross, Cassandra
- Venue
- Social Science Computer Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-03-19
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 955-973
- ISSN
- 0894-4393 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8286
- OpenAlex
- W3136328719
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 7.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Social Science Computer Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Cybersecurity Cooperative Research Centre
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Keywords
- romance fraud, identity crime, online dating fraud, victim reactions, web search, fraud detection, victim harm, financial fraud
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review